Every odd integer is the difference of 2 squares. Direct Proof. Let m and n be any integers such that; 2m^2 – (2n+1)^2 = 2k +-1 4m^2 – 4n^2 -4n -1 = 2k +- 1 2(2m^2 -2n^2 -2n) – 1 = 2k +- 1 Does this work?
(2m)^2 – (2n)^2 = 2k +-1 4m^2 – 4n^2 = 2k +- 1 2(m^2 -n^2) = 2k +- 1 Doesnt seem to fit
every odd integer is the difference of 2 consecutive squares
do you mean 2 consecutive squares or do you mean the square of 2 consecutive numbers ?
1 - 0 = 1 2 - 1 = 3 3 - 2 = 5 4 - 3 = 7 5 - 4 = 9.
thoseare lazy squares :)
3-2=5?
3^2 - 2^2 = 5 :)
oh lazy squares i get it
ok oh thats neat never realized that i don't think maybe i forgot let n be the fist integer and let n+1 be the next integer (n+1)^2-n^2=n^2+2n+1-n^2=2n+1 2n+1 is odd
so (n+1)^2-n^2 is odd
go ahead satellite rain on my parade
your last line is the only one needed right?
yes
yes
maybe
i was wondering if the proof had to be that every odd number is the difference of any 2 squares; but i might be reading to much into it
of course. general odd integer \[2k+1=(k+1)^2-k^2\]
and of course the teacher said that k would indicate the same integer
would have to include subs
as in the proof that \[\sum_{k=0}^n 2k+1=n^2\]
start with \[\sum_{k=0}^n(k+1)^2-k^2=n^2\] and then do the algebra to see that you get \[\sum_{k=0}^n 2k+1\]
we havent learnted no sum notation so its not allowed ... lol
lol. what you wrote above is exactly the same thing right? like the telescoping sum. one term minus the previous one
it is... but I gots the antiGuass teacher ...
that aint how I showed it to you !!! YOU FAIL!!!
antiguasse? lol
think photoshop comes with an anti gausse feature
i believe it does, but you have to read it in korean
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!