find dy/dx by implicit differentiation for x^1/2 + y^1/2 = 16 I kind of understand the guidelines for it, but at the same time I'm ehh about it.
ok so since they want you to use implicit differentiation, you don't need to solve for "y" first...
basically you just do this: 1/2x^-1/2 + 1/2y^-1/2dy/dx = 0
i worked it out and i checked the answer and it says that it should be \[-\sqrt{y/x} \] im not sure how that happened.
you have to solve for y prime by making the dy/dx stand for y prime.
all you do is take the derivatives of each piece like you normally would, but when you take the derivative of "y", you need to remember the dy/dx part...because you're eventually solving for dy/dx
do you understand what i did so far?
the derivative of x^1/2 is 1/2x^-1/2
yeah that i understand
the 1/2 in the front is cancelled out? that just dissapeared. thats what i wanted to know.
Im saying that for a later step, umm im going through the work for the answer online and i didnt understand what happened there.
\[D[x^{1/2} + y^{1/2} = 16]\] \[D[x^{1/2}] +D[y^{1/2}] = D[16]\] \[\frac{1}{2x^{1/2}}x' +\frac{1}{2y^{1/2}}y' = 0\] \[\frac{1}{2y^{1/2}}y' = -\frac{1}{2x^{1/2}}x'\] \[y' = -\frac{2y^{1/2}}{2x^{1/2}}x'\] \[y' = -\frac{y^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}x';\ \text{and x' = 1 with respect to x}\] \[y' = -\frac{y^{1/2}}{x^{1/2}}\]
my internet sucks right now :(
it's ok im still trying to understand amistre, i feel like i understand this , like as far as the guidelines that my textbook explain. Now even better with amistre's explanation and everyone elses. But if I continue doing this, i'm still going to make some sort of mistake... -.-
implicits are nothin special, or any different from explicits
tell me, what is the derivative of: 3x^2 ?
6x
close, but no. 6x x' i never said the derivative with respect to x. and what you are used to doing is throwing this precious little derived bit away since it equals 1; with respect to itself
what is the derivative of: 3y^2 ? ; or 3r^2, or 3m^2?
the rules dont change and never have; you are just used to throwing out the derived bit by habit instead of sorting it out in the end
so it would be 6y y' ?
yes
hmm maybe because i just stated doing this and my teacher didnt explain that, but she never told me to do that and my text book doesnt show that. (atleast so far... )
it wont show that either ....
oh so thats just something i should know? hmmm
its something you should be taught :) and once taught, all the rest of the enigma tends to go away
the product rule is still the product rule right? [xy]' = x'y+xy'
yes lol
if this is with respect yo y; y'=1; if with respect to x, x'=1; if respect to time; neither equals 1
these derived bit are the workings of the chain rule; always poping out little derived bits
keep them and sort thru them in the end and you will never go wrong
So I would use the chain rule for lets say x^2y+y^2x =-2 I've been kind of stuck on how to approach this one
the chain rule is at work; but not the full blown method that youre used to it being here
i see product, and power rules
D[x^2 y + y^2 x = -2] D[x^2 y] + D[y^2 x] = D[-2] -------------------------------------- D[x^2 y] = x'^2 y+x^2 y' = 2x x' y + x^2 y' D[y^2 x] = y^2' x+y^2 x' = 2y y' x+ y^2 x' D[-2] = 0 ---------------------------- 2x x' y + x^2 y' + 2y y' x+ y^2 x' = 0 and since x'=1 with respect to x we can toss them 2xy + x^2 y' + 2y y' x+ y^2 = 0 and solve for y'
x^2 y' + 2xy y' = -2xy - y^2 y' (x^2 + 2xy) = -2xy - y^2 y' = (-2xy - y^2) ---------- (x^2 + 2xy)
or neatly: \[D[x^2 y + y^2 x = -2]\] \[D[x^2 y] + D[y^2 x] = D[-2]\] -------------------------------------- \[D[x^2 y] = x'^2 y+x^2 y' = 2x x' y + x^2 y'\] \[ D[y^2 x] = y'^2 x+ y^2 x' = 2y y' x+ y^2 x' \] \[D[-2] = 0\] ---------------------------- \[2x x' y + x^2 y' + 2y y' x+ y^2 x' = 0\] and sort
Ohh boy, and to think i was once good at math, this has made me think twice about it. So for some reason the whole x' y' is totally throwing me off.
they are simply place holders in a sense
you can reformat them as \(y'=\cfrac{dy}{d*}\) and \(x'=\cfrac{dx}{d*}\) and then fill in the * part afterwards really
if we say we want this with respect to x then we get: \(y'=\cfrac{dy}{dx}\) and \(x'=\cfrac{dx}{dx}=1\)
the best thing to do is to pick a method that works best for you and own it :)
maybe thats whats throwing me off, i use dy/dx and dx/dx which is 1 instead of y' and it just looks weird to me. because based on the work u showed me i think i figured how to do it. but im not sure
woah not because i meant but * lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!