Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

how do you graph an equation y=a*f(x+h)-k something like this

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

Start with the graph of f(x) then stretch the graph by a factor of 'a' (this will depend on if |a| > 1 or |a| < 1) if a < 0, then flip the graph over the x axis now shift the graph to the left/right 'h' units (this of course depends on whether h is positive or negative) finally, shift the graph up/down k units (again this depends on whether k is positive or negative) This is a very vague description of what's going on here, so it would be best to provide the actual function if you can.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i have a graph of y=f(x) which have a coordinate of (-4,-3) (-2,2) (-1,2) (1,0) (3,4) (5,4) then it ask the domain and range, after that you have to sketch the graph with this given equation y=-3*f(x+3)-3

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

is there a curve going through these points, or is the entire graph just these set of points?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its the set of points going up,

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

but are they connected?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

ok

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the domain is the set of all allowable inputs so if there are no holes/asympotes, then the domain is the set of all real numbers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

is the domain the x's and the range is the y's?

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the range is the set of all possible outputs if there are no holes or horizontal asymptotes and each y value is hit, then the range is also the set of all real numbers

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yes that's one way to think of it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok so i don;t really need the "a" if i know the formulas like a>1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean i dont need to graph it

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

not sure what you mean

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean in my equation i have y=-3*f(x+3)-3 then i know that its a reflection because a<0, then i will move the points to the right 3 units then down 3 units

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

oh i see, yes you can follow that procedure keep in mind that you're also scaling by 3

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

since |a| = |-3| = 3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

are you talking about "a"? and if you are uhm how do i scale that

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

for instance, if you have the point (1,2) and you scale it by 3, you're multiplying the y coordinate by 3 to get (1, 6)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh, so im multiplying the reflection coordinates by 3 then

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok now i get it :D thanks a lot, I appreciate it

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

np

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!