factor x^4 + 1. over non reals
\[(x^2-1)(x^2+1)=(x-1)(x+1)(x-i)(x+i)\]
thats wrong
x^4 +1 = (x^2)^2 - i ^2 = (x^2 + i)(x^2-i)
oops i thought that was a minus sign in between x^4 and 1
\[(x^2-i)(x^2+i)\]
so im having trouble factoring x^2 + i
my bad! its early for me and i don't have my glasses on lol
how do you know when to stop factoring?
\[(x^2 + 1)^2 = (x^2+i)(x^2-i) \]
factor it into a+bi , roots
youre not there yet , lol
this is a delight
\[x = \pm e^{i \pi/4}\]
should be 4 roots
,how did you get that evern
sorry ... x = \pm e^{i (\pi/4 +\pi/2)}
use euler's form e^ix.. this allows us to calculates roots easily( a root is ^1/k)
smoething wrong with the renderer ... \[x = \pm e^{i (\pi/4 +\pi/2)}\]
that was the 2nd set of sols
that was the 2nd set of sols
was i any help?
yes very much , one sec
how did you know it was pi/4
we have x = sqrt (i) , -sqrt (i) , sqrt (-i) , -sqrt(-i)
imagine the complex plane the imaginary axis,which denotes \[ \pi/4 \] is at an angle of 90 degrees to the real axis => 90/2 = 45 =>pi/4 \[i = e^{i \pi/2}\]
i dont follow
the imaginary axis is pi/2 to the real axis
yes...and then we sq root it.The square root expressed as an exponential is x^(1/2) hence the entire power bit of the exponent is divided by 2 giving pi/4
ok so you did x^2 = e^i(pi/2 +2pik )
, for x^2 = i
yes...and then we sq root it.The square root expressed as an exponential is x^(1/2) hence the entire power bit of the exponent is divided by 2 giving pi/4
there are actually an infintie number of solutions, but we are interested in the principal
yes...i actually skipped out on generalizing 2pi phase factor
ok and this follows from the fact that a + b i = r e^i(theta + 2pik) ?
, which is euler identity
ok so then its just a matter of exponentiation , x = e^[i(pi/2 + 2pik)*1/2]
yes....again while doing the initial pass over the question (complex analysis) i usually omit the 2pi factor.It necessary for the later steps but it just makes a mess while trying to understand the solution.
you got it
we could have also used the trig form of a + bi = rcos t + i sin t , but this is cleaner
:)
then wed have to use demoivres theorem, exponential is faster
once again an astute observation with a firm logical reason backing it up
yes i dont even remember demoivrs,
this is more concise ;)
so i have x = +- e^[i(3pi/4)], x = + - e^[i(pi/4)]
, why isnt it acceptable to just write the solutions as above
what grade are you in?
x = sqrt (i) , -sqrt (i) , sqrt (-i) , -sqrt(-i)
im in college ;)
my book gives radical solutions , sqrt2/2 + i sqrt 2 / 2 , etc
ahh...then there should be no problem in expressing the answer as an exponent
no i mean, the book didnt leave it in exponential euler form
books generally use a computer program to solve their questions and programs rarely try an make stuff easier for people to understand (I should know as i'm doing engineering in computer science)
books generally use a computer program to solve their questions and programs rarely try an make stuff easier for people to understand (I should know as i'm doing engineering in computer science)
so basically they want sqrt i = a + b i , for some a,b , and they got sqrt2/2 + sqrt2/2 i , or something
apparently its not good to leave it as i^(1/2) as a solution
if you insist....here is where we expnad eulers form \[e^{ix} = cos(x) + i sin(x)\]
there we go
so sometimes we use all three forms
cos(3pi/4) = -1/sqrt(2) ,sin(3pi/4) = 1/sqrt(2) .....i'm not sure about the exact values just check them on a calculator
, err, two forms , etc
yes sometimes depending on what you need easy additive manipulation or easy multiplicative manipulation you use different forms
thx are you good with 3d graphers , i have this website called romanlabs.com , i found a 3d grapher but i cant figure out the code input
i also have a calculus problem, Find the derivative of f (x, y) = xy/ (x+ y) at the point (2, -1) in the direction of 6i + 8j . i got it started the partials are
< y^2/(x+y)^2, x^2/(x+y^2) >
it would be sweet if i could figure out how to use this graphing calculuator
there are ways of graphing complex numbers (we usually express the imaginary diemensions as colors)
p.s. if you want to see the function use wolfram alpha (online .....realy good) or gnuplot(offline allows more flexibility but is more complex) ...note both service/programs are free/open source.
anyway must leave if you have any other related questions feel free to fb me (note: my fb profile has my name misspelled so look for "Erevn")
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!