How do i change y = a sin(bx+c)+d to a cosine graph y = e cos (fx + g ) + h. what transformation , so I am given, a,b,c,d. find e,f,g,h
Do you mean to say both the graphs should look the same?
yes
i think i got it, use sin x = cos ( pi/2 - x )
but then we have the d and stuff on the end
given a,b,c,d for a y = asinb(bx+c)+d , find e,f,g,h equivalent cos graph
OK! We'll fix e=a and h=d Then, sin(bx+c)=cos(fx+g), is what we want right? But we know sin(pi/2 - x)=cos(x) Therefore, sin(bx+c)=cos(pi/2 - (bx+c)) Therefore, cos(pi/2 - bx - c) = cos(fx+g) This has infinite sols, but the most trivial one would be to equate all the coefficients of x and constants, ie. f=-b & g = pi/2 - c
Yes you are right to that point!
If i interpreted the question correctly and its to make both the graphs same, not transforming one into another!
yes both graphs the same , hmmm so you can set e= a and h = d ?
Yea no restrictions on that!
yes it works,
yes, that makes sense, so by setting e= a and h = d, you get a simpler problem of equating sin(bx+c) and cos (fx+g)
this corresponds to a flip about the y axis , and a shift , then you can apply the amplification factor (amplitude) and then the vertical shift
First the vertical shift (d), then the amplification(a), then the expansion (b) and then the horizontal shift (c).
yes but you have to be careful, these transformations are not always commutative. for instance flipping about the x axis after you have shifted up vertically
in our case all we have are vertical, horizontal shift, and flip about the y axis, so the order does not count (commutativity)
so im trying to show that sin (bx+c) = cos [-bx + (pi/2-c)] using tranformations
I know, the order I've given is commutative. And horizontal shift and flip about the y axis is also non-commutative!
no it is commutative
horizontal shift and flip about y axis is commutiative
-f(x) + d is not equal to - ( f(x) + d ) , essentially
f(-(x+c)) , is that what you mean ?
I'm saying f((-x)-c) <> f(-(x-c)). Yea, that's what you said right?
Which means that they are non-commutative
no a shift is f(x) + d
h(x) = f(x) + d
a vertical shift i mean, a horizontal shift is h(x) = f(x-c)
you would never write f( (-x) - c ) , since that doesnt make sense, f ((-x) - c ) = f ( -x - c ) = f ( -(x+c))
you always have to think of it as f(u), where u is some function of x (possibly x by itself )
so you have f(ku), f(u-c) , and f(u) + c
those are the vertical, horiz. and reflections. for rotations you can throw in a matrix
ok for your example it might be easier to use a square root function, since its more clear sqrt(x) --> sqrt ( x - 4) ---> sqrt ( - ( x - 4)) versus sqrt(x) ---> sqrt ( -x) ---> sqrt (
sqrt(x) ---> sqrt ( -x) ---> sqrt ((-x)-4). oh then it is not commutative.
Yup, you can write it as f((-x)+c) . Hope that helped!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!