Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}{(1+\frac{3}{x})^{4x}}

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}{(1+\frac{3}{x})^{4x}}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\lim_{x \to \infty} \left( 1 + \frac{3}{x}\right)^{4x}\]

OpenStudy (perl):

hello

OpenStudy (perl):

we know that ( 1 + 1/x ) ^x as x->oo is e

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I didn't know that actually :-P

OpenStudy (perl):

so me and the rest of those who know ;)

OpenStudy (perl):

just pretend that you know ;)

OpenStudy (perl):

what rules are you supposed to use anyway ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I have no idea... it's a question that tests the convergence of a sequence.... and I am sure it does but I don't know the value it converges to.

OpenStudy (perl):

lim ( 1 + 3/x) ^(4x) = [ 1 + 1 / ( x/3) ] ^4x

OpenStudy (perl):

let u = x/3, as x->00, u->oo because oo/3 ->oo

OpenStudy (anonymous):

true

OpenStudy (perl):

lim ( 1 + 1/u ) ^ ( 4*3u)

OpenStudy (perl):

lim [( 1 +1/u)^u ]^12 , so it will be e^12

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's the answer

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hey Perl If f(x) -> o (1 + f(x))^(g(x)) where g(x) tends to infinity it is equal to e^(g(x)*ln f(x)) right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I still don't get it :-(

OpenStudy (perl):

ishann, it depends

OpenStudy (perl):

but youre right insofar as its an indeterminate form

OpenStudy (perl):

agdg, basically 'we know' that ( 1 +1/x) ^x goes to e as x->oo, and we just use a substitution

OpenStudy (perl):

agdg, it is usually given by the teacher

OpenStudy (perl):

given : lim ( 1 +1/x) ^x as x->00 is e, this should be in your notes. you could try saying assume it has a limit , so y = ( 1 + 1/x) ^x , then ln y = x ln ( 1 + 1/x)

OpenStudy (perl):

find the limit ln ( 1 + 1/x) / ( 1/x) as x->oo

OpenStudy (perl):

you have 0/0, so now use Lhopital's rule

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oooh alright

OpenStudy (perl):

1/ ( 1 + x^-1) *-1*x^-2 * 1/ (-1*x^-2) now those cancel so we have

OpenStudy (perl):

you are left with 1 / ( 1 + 1/x) , and the limit of that as x->oo is 1 , so ln y = 1, so y = e^1

OpenStudy (perl):

now that we know lim (1 + 1/x) ^x is e, we can use a substitution to solve the original problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yay I will impress my calc teacher thanks now I get it!

OpenStudy (perl):

ishann, can you link your pdf

OpenStudy (perl):

thats a powerful theorem, im not sure though it works for all cases

OpenStudy (perl):

If f(x) -> o (1 + f(x))^(g(x)) where g(x) tends to infinity it is equal to e^(g(x)*ln f(x))... only under certain conditions

OpenStudy (perl):

also im not sure how that helps in this problem

OpenStudy (perl):

e^( 4x * ln ( 1/x) ) ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

e^(f(x)*g(x)) that is what I mean not the ln part sorry

OpenStudy (anonymous):

take the log, take the limit, exponentiate although there is probably a snappier way to do it with your eyes

OpenStudy (perl):

no you were right before, we were given f(x)^g(x), so we know that f(x)^g(x) = e^[ ln f(x)^g(x)]

OpenStudy (perl):

so f(x)^g(x) = e^[ g(x) ln f(x) ]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if you want a guess i would say it is \[e^{12}\] it is surely e to the something

OpenStudy (perl):

so find lim e^[ 4x ln ( 1 + 1/x) ]

OpenStudy (perl):

so that doesnt really get us anywhere

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not it can't be like that in my opinion y = (1 + f(x))^g(x) f(x) tends to zero while g(x) to infinity logy = g(x)log(1 + f(x)) but since f(x) tends to zero it must become log(1 + f(x)) tends to f(x) log y = g(x)*f(x) y = e^(f(x)*g(x))

OpenStudy (anonymous):

start with \[4x\ln(1+\frac{x}{3})\] then rewrite as \[4\frac{\ln(\frac{3+x}{3})}{\frac{1}{x}}\] and use l\hopital

OpenStudy (perl):

ishaan, but then you would get e^4 , which is false

OpenStudy (anonymous):

log 1 = 0 but there we have 1 + f(x) where f(x) tends to zero it is near to zero but not zero so it has to be f(x) for the whole log(1 + f(x))

OpenStudy (perl):

e^( 1/x * 4x ) = e^4

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[e^{\frac{3}{x}*4x} = e^{12}\]

OpenStudy (perl):

but since f(x) tends to zero it must become log(1 + f(x)) tends to f(x) ?

OpenStudy (perl):

log ( 1 + f(x)) ~ f(x) if f(x)->0 ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah that is what I am thinking

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it must be like that

OpenStudy (perl):

i disagree

OpenStudy (perl):

lim log ( 1 + u) / u as u->0 is not 1

OpenStudy (perl):

err, wait it is

OpenStudy (perl):

lim log ( 1 + x ) / x as x->0 is 1, so they are asymptotic to each other. very good, you used a different fact

OpenStudy (perl):

but to prove this we use Lhopital, lim 1/(1+x) / (1) and as u->0 it becomes 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right! nice

OpenStudy (perl):

i took derivative of top and bottom

OpenStudy (perl):

interesting argument , you just thought of that on the fly ?

OpenStudy (perl):

oh and f(x) must be continuous , etc

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I saw that somewhere couldn't recall it, but yeah the proof just bumped in my head

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey how'd you track katrina's ip?

OpenStudy (perl):

hmmm, shivampatel.net

OpenStudy (perl):

dont tell her though

OpenStudy (perl):

but, when i compare log ( 1 + x) to x , i get a discrepanct

OpenStudy (perl):

discrepancy *

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay! I won't; Thanks

OpenStudy (perl):

hmmm, maybe it should be ln ( 1 + x) , not base 10

OpenStudy (perl):

ok perfect, now it works

OpenStudy (perl):

yes now it is VERY close , it has to be ln , not log (base 10 )

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah natural log

OpenStudy (perl):

so ln ( 1 + u ) ~ u for u -> 0 , and you can substitute a continuous function there

OpenStudy (perl):

you did a very nice argument

OpenStudy (perl):

but its false that log ( 1 + u ) ~ u , for base 10

OpenStudy (perl):

change it to log ( 1 + u ) ~ ln ( 10 ) u ?

OpenStudy (perl):

oh i see my mistake , the derivative of log ( 1 + x ) is not 1/(1+x) if it is not base e

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks you made it better

OpenStudy (perl):

log ( 1+u) = ln ( 1 + u ) / ln 10 ~ u / ln 10

OpenStudy (perl):

there, fixed it now

OpenStudy (perl):

log ( 1 + u) ~ u/ln 10 as u-> 0+

OpenStudy (anonymous):

excellent perl I presume you are university student

OpenStudy (perl):

i have bachelor's ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wow awesome in math right?

OpenStudy (perl):

*shrugs*

OpenStudy (perl):

i love math, it keeps me alive ;)

OpenStudy (perl):

i suffer from depression , it is my joy

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i love math too I wanna do game programming

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nice loving math is a good thing to do

OpenStudy (perl):

i like world at war, very nice maps

OpenStudy (perl):

call of duty

OpenStudy (perl):

some maps look foggy and crappy, but some are pretty

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes Indeed game programming uses lot of math if you like games you can get started too

OpenStudy (perl):

oh, hey do you like 3d graphing? i found a program romanlabs.com and a crack

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I mean you will have upper hand you are good in maths all you need to learn is just the language 3d graphing yeah though I didn't do much of 3d math but yeah i like it thanks for the resource

OpenStudy (perl):

hey is this a joke There are 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary, those who don't, and those who can use induction.

OpenStudy (perl):

10 = 2 in binary math

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol

OpenStudy (perl):

looks like 3 to me

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!