Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

What is a number?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A number is a mathematical object used to count and measure.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In my older questions, we've proved a lot of obvious things about numbers such as 1 is not equal to 0, (and maybe some less obvious things such as |a+b| leq |a| + |b|), but I still don't understand what a number actually is.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I used numbers in my previous questions in a very abstract way; I haven't counted or measured anything. So numbers are more than just mere counting/measuring objects.

OpenStudy (perl):

what was the proof 1 is not equal to zero ?

OpenStudy (perl):

a number can be defined as the equivalence class of sets that are in 1-1 correspondance with it. so for instance, 1 = { {a}, { elephant} , { calculator} , {tree} , ... }

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does that really answer the question? I still don't know what a number truly is :(

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we can have numbers without set theory, right?

OpenStudy (perl):

well, see how i just shifted the question to , what is a 1-1 correspondance. well its a bijection between sets. what is a set... and on and on we go .

OpenStudy (perl):

but the nice part about math is that we define the RELATIONS between objects, even if we do not know what the objects actually are. we can only intuit it. and we model numbers , so for instance what is '2 trees', or '3 hydrogen atoms' . thats a model of what a number is , the property we have in mind

OpenStudy (perl):

2 trees , we are not interested in the texture, color , of the trees. we are interested in the 'twoness'. what all twoness things have in common. even if we cannot define it without going in circles, at least we are consistent in our relations and about these twoness and threeness things

OpenStudy (anonymous):

numbers have become so abstract as math evolved.

OpenStudy (perl):

well, thats because we found more fundamental ways to describe numbers. i dont know if they are more abstract, since they were always abstract to begin with. can you show me a number 3? where is it? 3 is not the symbol we refer to 3 as , '3'. thats just the label for it . so where is it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I can show you 3 camels, but what about 0 camels?

OpenStudy (perl):

math is a construct of the mind, evolved by millions of years of environmental pressure. math does not 'exist' outside the mind, but the relationships do exist in nature which have molded our brains over evolutionary pressure and selection. ie, people who could count sheep got laid more ;) (without oversimplifying)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can you show me 2/3 of a camel, or -1 camel, or 0.20982397327810039135871322225343... camels, or 3 + 2i camels?

OpenStudy (perl):

yes you can show me 3 camels, but you cant point to '3' in nature

OpenStudy (perl):

you can say, i hope you agree that all these triplets of things have something in common, that which is 'threeness'

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but I've never encountered the other kinds of numbers (besides natural numbers) in nature

OpenStudy (perl):

3 camels, 3 donkeys, 3 beetles, 3 horses, ... what do all these things have in common?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

there are 3 of them?

OpenStudy (perl):

lets say i am an alien and i dont know what 3 is

OpenStudy (perl):

nope, 3 is chinese to me. so what do they have in common . i see they have fur, they smell funny ..

OpenStudy (perl):

so there is a way to explain to an alien what 3 horses, 3 trees, 3 alligators, .. have in common . besides for being animals. we could mix it up and throw in 3 rocks

OpenStudy (perl):

first the alien has to agree that these are 'collections', groups or assemblages

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we can show him that pattern

OpenStudy (perl):

what is the pattern of 3 ?

OpenStudy (perl):

remember, i am alien, dont know what 3 is

OpenStudy (anonymous):

groups of 3 stuffs

OpenStudy (perl):

but i do know what sets are , they are like bags with stuff in side. i know how to seperate things into groups

OpenStudy (perl):

what is 3 stuffs? you are going in circles

OpenStudy (perl):

ok, here is a way to explain to an alien what 3 is. its a roundabout way, but it does the job

OpenStudy (anonymous):

will the alien figure out the remaining numbers?

OpenStudy (perl):

dunno. but you can use functions or 'mappings'. so you have a bag of little pebbles that you use to 'correspond' to objects.

OpenStudy (perl):

first we have to define what it means =, < , >

OpenStudy (perl):

= means that given a barn of animals , and you have a pouch of marbles say. suppose that as each animal exits the barn, you take one marble out of the pouch. if there are no more animals in the barn, and there are no more marbles in the pouch, then the 'size' or cardinality of the marbles in the pouch is the cardinality of the animals in the barn

OpenStudy (anonymous):

true

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the barn thing reminds me of a joke.... I can't remember it :(

OpenStudy (perl):

now, we can also define more easily if we use the marbles in the pouch example again

OpenStudy (perl):

suppose that i run out of marbles to take out of my pouch and there are still animals exiting the barn. so the cardinality of the pouch of marbles is < than the cardinality of animals

OpenStudy (perl):

suppose that all the animals have exited the barn, and there is still marbles in my bag. then i can say the cardinality of marble pouch is greater than cardinality of barn animals. notice that in my 3 cases, i never use the word 'more', equal, or less. then my definition would be circular

OpenStudy (perl):

so there are three cases with my pouch of marbles. i run out of marbles , i have marbles left, or there are no marbles in the pouch. these are the three conditions , < , > , and = , with respect to the set of barn animals and the set of marbles

OpenStudy (perl):

mathematicians call them, injection, surjection, and bijection

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so injection = <, surjection = >, and bijection = = ?

OpenStudy (perl):

not quite , injection is actually <=, surjection is >=

OpenStudy (perl):

the function (or mapping) M1 -> horse M2-> sheep M3-> rabbit M4-> mouse donkey is an injection

OpenStudy (perl):

actually this answers a different question, why is 3 > 2, for instance. to define 3 , we use the set of all sets that are bijective with { {}, {{}}, {{{}}}} }

OpenStudy (perl):

A standard construction in set theory, a special case of the von Neumann ordinal construction, is to define the natural numbers as follows: We set 0 := { }, the empty set, and define S(a) = a ∪ {a} for every set a. S(a) is the successor of a, and S is called the successor function. By the axiom of infinity, the set of all natural numbers exists and is the intersection of all sets containing 0 which are closed under this successor function. This then satisfies the Peano axioms. Each natural number is then equal to the set of all natural numbers less than it, so that 0 = { } 1 = {0} = {{ }} 2 = {0, 1} = {0, {0}} = { { }, {{ }} } 3 = {0, 1, 2} = {0, {0}, {0, {0}}} = { { }, {{ }}, {{ }, {{ }}} } n = {0, 1, 2, ..., n-2, n-1} = {0, 1, 2, ..., n-2,} ∪ {n-1} = {n-1} ∪ (n-1) = S(n-1) and so on

OpenStudy (perl):

so you can construct all of math from nothing, literally ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yay!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

this may just be a rumor, but I hear that 1 is the loneliest number.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A number is a thing that is used to count.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!