\[(M,d), (N,r) \text { metric spaces } f: M\rightarrow N \text{ continuous at } x_0, f(M)\subset B\subset M\] is \[f\text{ continuous as a function } (Md) \text {to} (B,r)\] \[(M,d), (N,r) \text { metric spaces } f: M\rightarrow N \text{ continuous at } x_0, f(M)\subset B\subset M\] is \[f\text{ continuous as a function } (Md) \text {to} (B,r)\] @Mathematics
is this in carothers too?
Did you typed the question correctly.
no it is not from corothers, and i think i typed it in right.
I find this part a little weird \[f(M)\subset B\subset M\]
ok that is a typo too. should be \[f(M)= B \subset N\]
in other words, is the function continuous if you restrict to the codmain. my initial reaction is "of course" but frequently there are pathologies i don't take in to account. but if the pre-image of an open set is open, i can't see how the restriction can make any difference.
I would try just using the epsilon delta definition of continuity on a metric space.. Of hand I can see any problems either
off
are you just checking for continuity at x0 correct?
yeah that is what i am thinking. sometime the obvious thing is in fact true. i will look at this again when the wine wears off. thanks again. yes and x0
i was worried about what the different metrics could be, but open mean open irrespective ov the metric, so i cannot see a problem
you know what I meant...but I meant to type...can't see any problems
especially since you are not changing the metrics themselves...just the underlying set
right. so i am going to stick to the obvious answer, namely that the preimage of and open set is open, and the image is in the codomain.
actually that can change which sets are open, but I don't see that as a problem here
but topological definition is pre-image of open set is open. pre-image live in F(M) so it should be fine.
with respect to (B,r) B is clopen but B might not be open in N
yes but the premise is that f is continuous at x0 as a function form M to N
correct...so I don't think it matters.
oh i see what you are saying. maybe B is not open it N? but it must be right?
no
inverse image of a neighbor of f(x0) is open in N .
but is it possible it is not open in f(M) ?
it will be
ok that is what i thought. thanks again. now it is dinner time.
Thanks for posting these problems. I don't get many opportunities to talk to someone about real analysis.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!