Suppose f and g are prices of traded securities that depend on the same source of uncertainty. Their evolution is governed by the following geometric Brownian motions: df = αfdt + βfdz dg = γgdt + δgdz Let P be the relative price of g in terms of f: P == f/g (a) (10 points) Find the expression for dP [Hint: Proceed in the following steps. (1) Define x == In(P) and use the Lognormal Property (or Ito's Lemma if you prefer) to find dx. (2) Note that P = e^x: and use Ito's lemma to find dy = dP. (b) (5 points) What restriction on the parameters α, β, γ, and δ would make P a martingale? Explain.Suppose f and g are prices of traded securities that depend on the same source of uncertainty. Their evolution is governed by the following geometric Brownian motions: df = αfdt + βfdz dg = γgdt + δgdz Let P be the relative price of g in terms of f: P == f/g (a) (10 points) Find the expression for dP [Hint: Proceed in the following steps. (1) Define x == In(P) and use the Lognormal Property (or Ito's Lemma if you prefer) to find dx. (2) Note that P = e^x: and use Ito's lemma to find dy = dP. (b) (5 points) What restriction on the parameters α, β, γ, and δ would make P a martingale? Explain.
x = ln(P) = ln(f/g) = ln f - ln g Then by Ito's lemma, dx = ( αf/f dt + βf/f dz) - (γg/g dt + δg/g dz) = (α - γ) dt + (β - δ) dz Now I'll let you figure out how to get back to dP using Ito's lemma again.
JamesJ, could you please describe how to get back to dP by using Ito's lemma because I am stuck on that part. Please be detailed because I am so stuck on this little part. It would be most helpful so I would very much appreciate your effort!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!