Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yes very nice^
OpenStudy (asnaseer):
this will give you:\[x=\ln(\frac{2-t}{1-t})+c\]then use the initial values you were given to find c.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ok. thank you very much asnaseer
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i think there should be another part though, check your answer book blue12
OpenStudy (asnaseer):
yw - @Outkast3r09 basically gave the same steps but just in words.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no i dont see another part
OpenStudy (anonymous):
well, maybe im wrong
OpenStudy (anonymous):
it is page 462. problem 51.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
you'l need to use partials to solve
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i believe he's right
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
dont worry about it the intal values give you c
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah he is right. @Outkast3r09
OpenStudy (anonymous):
hm alright@ LagrangeSon678
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i am stuck again!. i got x=ln(2-t)/(1-t)+C
how do i find C now?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i know i am dumb..
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
hy Outkast3r09 can u plz explain
OpenStudy (anonymous):
you have to put in the values for x(t)=0 you're going to get imaginary numbers i believe since inside the natural log will be negatives
OpenStudy (anonymous):
now, replace t with 0
OpenStudy (anonymous):
remeber ln(1)=0
OpenStudy (anonymous):
t with 0??
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
in your anti derivaitve
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yes but i think the integration is off?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
o no its good
OpenStudy (anonymous):
why are you replacing t with 0... shouldn't it be replaced with 3?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
x=ln(t-2)-ln(t-1)+ln2 is the answer in the book
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
o wait nvm i thought it was lnor ln
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ln(1/2)+c=0
c=-ln(1/2)
c=-ln(1)-(-ln(2)= 0+ln(2)
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ln(t-2)-ln(t-1)=ln(t-2)/ln(t-1)
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so all together you get
\[\frac{\ln(t-2)}{\ln(t-1)}+\ln(2)\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
hm i get it thanku OutKast3r09 and LagrangeSon678
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
anybody know about parametric equation
OpenStudy (anonymous):
that would hav ebeen insane if it was
\[\frac{\ln(t-2)}{ln(t-1)}\]
I was sitting here going .... hmm how would this be possible without imaginary... and i know smoewhat lagrange
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i know a lil about parametric equation
OpenStudy (anonymous):
can i get some help
OpenStudy (anonymous):
with?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
Find the parametric equations and a parameter interval for the motion of a particle that starts out at (a,0) and traces the x^2+y^2=a^2
OpenStudy (anonymous):
well the interval would be 0,infty due to squared i believe
OpenStudy (anonymous):
a^2 is a constant i belive lagrange?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
This is an equation of a circle with radius a.|dw:1321833855865:dw|