eg a11a22a33-a11a32a23-a12a21a33+a12a31a23+a13a21a32-a13a31a22 that...my teacher didnt quite get through to me with this one when do u use this in finding determinant?she explained it as something separate from cofactors so idk
|dw:1322935986301:dw|
i think that is what your refering to
\begin{pmatrix} x&y&z\\ n&1&2\\ m&3&4 \end{pmatrix} lets try to use this instead, might be easser to read and keep track of
\begin{pmatrix} x&&\\ &1&2\\ &3&4 \end{pmatrix} x(1*4-3*2) lets move the n & m over to help out the pattern \begin{pmatrix} &y&\\ &&2&n\\ &&4&m \end{pmatrix} -y(2m-4n) \begin{pmatrix} &&z\\ n&1&\\ m&3& \end{pmatrix} z(3n-1m) these are the parts of the overall determinate of the 3x3 matrix add them together to get the whole thing
now, those arent to be regarded as numbers; only placeholders for clarity
? this is my face right now o_O
firstly it is not a cofactor method right? or ero? but u still multiply along main diagonal?
\begin{pmatrix}\Large a_{11}&a_{12}&a_{13}\\ a_{21}&a_{22}&a_{23}\\ a_{31}&a_{32}&a_{33} \end{pmatrix} \[\Large D = a_{11}(a_{22}a_{33}-a_{32}a_{23})-...+...\] if your looking for the determinate of a 3x3 matrix; its alot to try to type out :)
what is a cofactor method? its been awhile
yh i get that part that u just typed was cofactor but the method in my question seems like cofactor
the method in your example, is the same from what I can parse
a11a22a33-a11a32a23-a12a21a33+a12a31a23+a13a21a32-a13a31a22 a11(a22a33-a32a23) -a12(a21a33-a31a23) +a13(a21a32-a31a22) oy thats hard on the eyes
look at that slide 66 there about
write, since the det is not 0, it is possible that there is an inverse to be found
the next test is to see if they are linearly independant i believe
or maybe not lol; the next slide has an adjoin that I am not familiar with yet
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!