let
I understand that it is clear the two vectors are linearly dependent, I'm just having trouble proving this algebraically.
Why do it algebraically if you can plot them in MATLAB :-D
oh.... can't be visualized using MATLAB :(
You can prove that two vectors are linearly dependent by computing their Wronskian.
... or equivalent thereof.
really? Had no idea the wronskian was used aside from variation of parameters.
something about it being 0 and whatnot
It's much easier than that, isn't it? Two vectors v and w are linearly dependent, by definition if there exist _non-zero_ constants a and b such that av + bw = 0. Now from that, you should be able to prove very easily your result.
That's what I had originally thought. I was then able to say that (a+kb) = 0. This doesn't prove anything, but I'm thinking it might be a basis for the nullspace?
From there I figured I could say that the existence of the nullspace proves linear depence.
Let\[\vec{v}=\begin{pmatrix} v_1\\ v_2 \end{pmatrix},\]\[\vec{u}=\begin{pmatrix} u_1\\ u_2 \end{pmatrix},\]\[\vec{u}=c\vec{v},\exists c\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}.\]Then\[\begin{vmatrix} v_1 & u_1\\ v_2 & u_2 \end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix} v_1 & cv_1\\ v_2 & cv_2 \end{vmatrix}=...\]
james is right. dont make this problem way harder than it has to be >.<
If v and w are Lin Dep, there exists nonzero constants a and b such that av + bw = 0 => v = (-b/a)w. Thus one is scalar multiple of the other. Conversely, suppose wlog that v = kw for some constant k. Then v + (-k)w = 0. Hence v and w and Lin Dep.
I understand the first proof provided. It makes perfect sense. However, the second one makes less sense. I don't understand how changing the constant to some other arbitrary constant proves linear dependence.
Let v and w be two vectors in a vector space V. Then let A be the statement: "v and w are linearly dependent" and let B be the statement "v can be written as a scalar multiple of w or vice versa" We want to show that A => B and B => A The proof of A => B is the first thing: If v and w are Lin Dep, there exists nonzero constants a and b such that av + bw = 0 => v = (-b/a)w. Thus one is scalar multiple of the other. The proof of the converse, B => A is now this: Suppose wlog (without loss of generality) that v = kw for some constant k. Then v + (-k)w = 0. Hence v and w and Lin Dep. ====== We write v = kw for some constant k because that's our hypothesis; we're starting with the statement B; this mathematical statement is what we know.
OH! Right. Hah, that's quite obvious now. Thanks!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!