differentiation question: draw the curve y=ln(x+1) for x values between 0 & 4 included. by drawing an appropriate straight line, obtain an approximate value for the positive square root of the equation x-2ln(x+1)=0.
i can't say i understand what this question wants. especially the part of about the "positive square root of \[x-2\ln(x+1)\] which frankly makes no sense
however, if you are trying to solve \[x-\ln(x+1)=0\] for x, then \[x=0\] works by inspection
makes sense, but what about the second part?
that is the second part
isnt that just x-2y=0
here is the picture of \[y=\ln(x+1)\] on the interval [0,4] http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ln%28x%2B1%29+x%3D0+to+4
I used wolfram too :P but what i dont get is the positive square root of the equation. how do i find that?
primary square root maybe?
what is this "square root" business?! it is not a square
\[\pm sqrt{...}, \color{#dd0011}{\text{use the +}}\]
dunno the business part lol
\[x-2\ln(x+1)=0\] has two solutions, but in no sense are they "square roots" of anything
\[ \sqrt{x-2ln(x+1)};\ x-2ln(x+1)\ge0\]
and how this relates to the first question is beyond me. i thought it was going to be a visualization of newton's method, but it is not. the first expression is not the same as the second one
maybe it is supposed to read "obtain an approximate value for the positive root of the equation x-2ln(x+1)=0. "
approximate: ln(x+1) with an appropriate line ... yada yada
maybe
yeah but that doesn't help solve \[x-2\ln(x+1)=0\] as far as i can see
the equation of the tangent line to ln(x+1) at x gives as a close approx of ln(x+1)
maybe we need to use the approximation of ln(x+1) in its place
or maybe its just the average rate of change from 0 to 4 that we use
http://openstudy.com/?F225231636612OYKJOD=_#/updates/4eec41e9e4b0367162f56dc3 might be more info here
no, those are separate questions
y = .4024 x is the line drawn from 0 to 4 http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y+%3D+%28ln%285%29-ln%281%29%29x%2F%284%29and+ln%28x%2B1%29+x%3D0+to+4
if we use that in place of ln(x+1) we can get an approx of the equation instead of having to use ln(x+1)
you can get a better and better approx by using like the first 5 terms of its taylor series expansion
oh okay thanks guys!
thats the best I can make sense of it, good luck with it :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!