Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (dumbcow):

Need help with infinite sum of a power series

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

\[\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+1)(1-p)^{n}\] where 0<p<1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm.... Let's try a trick here. \[(n+1)(1-p)^n = - \frac{d}{dp} (1-p)^{n+1}\] So \[ \sum_{n=0}^\infty (n+1)(1-p)^n = -\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{d}{dp}(1-p)^{n+1}= -\frac{d}{dp}(1-p)\sum_{n=0}^\infty (1-p)^n\] since 0 < p < 1, 1-p < 1, so \[ \sum_{n=0}^\infty (1-p)^n = \frac{1}{1-(1-p)} = \frac{1}{p}\] so finally, our sum becomes \[-\frac{d}{dp}(1-p)\frac{1}{p} = \frac{d}{dp}1-\frac{1}{p} = \frac{1}{p^2}\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

Is there a name for that trick? it's a new one on me.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm not sure, actually. Maybe. I suppose it would be a cousin of the "differentiation under the integral sign" technique, or "integration by parametric differentiation" if you want big words. Are you familiar with that?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I've heard of differentiation under the integral sign but never learned it :/

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I think I can extrapolate the idea though.

OpenStudy (jamesj):

The integral form is \[ \frac{d\ }{dt} \int_a^b f(x,t) \ dx = \int_a^b \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(x,t) \ dx \] Both with the series form and the integral form, you need to be careful changing the order the differentiation and summation; there are things that can go spectacularly wrong if the function in the integration or the series in the summation don't meet some standards of 'well-behaved'.

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

thanks everyone...I think i get it now

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!