Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 26 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are there any magnets that have only one pole?

OpenStudy (jamesj):

No, and if you managed to make one you'd be serious contender for a Nobel Prize.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How can you be so sure?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And why would it be so important so i would win a nobel prize?

OpenStudy (jamesj):

What I mean is we (human beings) have never observed one and we have good theoretical reasons to think it's unlikely. If you were able to make one, you would have changed in a radical way our understanding of one of the fundamental forces of nature. That's Nobel worthy.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh, what would an example of those theoretical reasons be?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And why does the magnet have such an impact on our understanding of the universe?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok, are there people trying to make a monopole magnet?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No magnet have only one pole.

OpenStudy (jamesj):

Yes, there a people trying different things.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What is grad B = 0?

OpenStudy (jamesj):

Maxwell's equations, which are fundamental to a huge portion of physics and which have withstood literally millions and millions of experimental verifications. The relevant equation ( div B = 0 ) implies there are no magnetic monopoles.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, i saw that but what does that mean?

OpenStudy (jamesj):

Since you don't know calculus, it's hard to describe to you exactly what this precise formulation means. But roughly it means that B is a vector field of magnetic force. div B = 0 means that there is no net 'flow' of magnetic force outside of a closed region of space. If there were a magnetic monopole, then there would be a net 'flow' of magnetic force outside of small sphere around the monopole. Maxwell's equation for the magnetic field says that's impossible.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So what you are saying is that a magnetic monopole would have a flow in one direction only? By the way, do you want me to learn basic calculus so that you can explain better?

OpenStudy (jamesj):

Yes. And no. Operators like div aren't basic calculus. Just recognize that there's a lot of mathematical language you need to learn to get to the bottom of a lot of these topics.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But i want to learn about these things...

OpenStudy (jamesj):

Then learning calculus will help. But as TuringTest explained to you yesterday, that topics rests on the foundation of a good command of basic algebra and trigonometry. It's basically impossible to jump ahead and learn calculus without those topics and it sounded yesterday as though you hadn't yet studied trigonometry. However, if you're really keen, get the mathematics text books from your school for the next 4 grades and begin to work through them.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The problem with my school is that it only goes up to 9th grade and im almost through that book already.. We dont have access to higher grade books. And as i said yesterday our school system is about 1 year behind the american system, i know that because i moved from an american school to a swedish school and my teachers wanted me to skip one grade. .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is this a good place to learn? http://www.khanacademy.org/#browse

OpenStudy (jamesj):

yes, that's not bad.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Awesome!

OpenStudy (asnaseer):

@JamesJ - I thought magnetic monopoles were predicted to exist in theory - its just that none have been observed yet? see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_monopole

OpenStudy (asnaseer):

there is also an interesting article on them here: http://news.discovery.com/space/on-the-trail-of-magnetic-monopoles.html

OpenStudy (jamesj):

The wikipedia article carefully states the Dirac result: IF there exist magnetic monopoles THEN electric charge is quantized. We have found that indeed electric charge is quantized, which suppers the idea there might be monopoles, but is not a theoretical prediction of it. There exists also different gauge theories which support the idea of the existence of magnetic monopoles. But there's no experimental evidence to support them right now.

OpenStudy (asnaseer):

ok - so you are saying there is no theory that actually predicts that they must exist?

OpenStudy (jamesj):

There are some gauge theories that predict the existence of monopoles, but they have no basis in observation. So I'd say there is no accepted theory in physics that predicts the existence of monopoles.

OpenStudy (jamesj):

There are a number of theories that admit the possibility of monopoles. The proof will be if we observe one! :-)

OpenStudy (asnaseer):

ok - thk for taking the time to clarify this - your explanations really help (as always)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are they theories that negate string theory?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Magnets can never have one pole because the Magnetic lines always travels from the north to the south so there is not magnet is with 1 pole you will need 2 poles for magnetic lines travel and for attracting magnetic materials

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think if you find a magnetic monopole you have probably found an unlimited source of energy.|dw:1325527208906:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think if we find a magnetic monopole we will have found an unlimited source of energy, then we just need to learn how to convert it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1325535581354:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!