What do both the theory of evolution and the theory of relativity have in common as scientific theories? a. Both are soon to become scientific laws. b. Both describe our expectations of the natural world. c. Both have strong scientific support. d. Both were once hypotheses that had to be tested.
c
they do?
what about b?
I'd say d
i dont think they were both tested, where they? If they were tested they would know if its correct or not
well both already have enough scientific studies that once were a hypothesis and still am. now they have scientific work on the subjects.
so what is it then?
im confused...
scientific support explains that the theory might be right.
so d?
Not sure... to me it seems like since there is data supporting these theories, therefore, they were tested... Maybe ikki4hire is right, c. Maybe c and d?
i think c is better because they do have background info. so C?
okk so what is this suppose to show?
That there is a hypothesis first and then you need supporting data to accept or reject it. Then D is correct.
That is true, i see that. So D it is?
can u help me on my question before this one?
I'd say this question is ultimately flawed. Both being scientific theories, they at one point were hypotheses that had to be tested. This makes D true. Also, in order to actually become scientific theories, there has to be VERY strong scientific evidence backing it, so C is true. Scientific theories, by definition, have to have very strong evidence supporting them, so if I had to choose, I would choose C. However, D is also a correct answer.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!