Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Find the distance between the point (2,-2,-9) and the paraboloid \[z = -\frac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2). \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There are a number of ways to do this, might I ask what course you are taking?

OpenStudy (paxpolaris):

\[distance^2= \left( x-2 \right)^2+(y+2)^2+(z+9)^2\] Substitute z and find minimum

OpenStudy (anonymous):

teaching AIME prep, so anything is fair game

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, you can either substitute for z in the distance formula, take partial derivatives and set them to zero, find the critical point, and substitute it into the distance formula, or you could do a nice application of Lagrange Multipliers if you're familiar with that. I would personally prefer the latter just because I like the technique, but it's up to you. We can help with whichever you'd prefer.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Lagrange Multipliers looks easier. Proofs that avoid calculus entirely are also welcomed.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Fair enough. Lagrange multipliers: The function to minimize is \[D^2 = (x-2)^2 + (y+2)^2 + (z+9)^2 \] subject to the constraint \[F(x,y,z) = \frac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2) + z = 0 \] We'll say that \[ \nabla D^2 = \lambda \nabla F \] which yields the following equations: \[2x-4 = \lambda \frac{x}{2} \] \[2y+4 = \lambda \frac{y}{2} \] \[2z + 18 = \lambda \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We can add the first equation to the second and multiply by two to give \[4(x+y) = \lambda(x+y) \] so either x= -y or lambda = 4. If we try lambda = 4 in either of the first two equations, though, we find immediately that it doesn't work. Oh well, such is life.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So apparently x = -y. If we plug that into our constraint equation, we find that \[z = \frac{-1}{2} x^2 \] But if we plug this into our third equation, we get \[-x^2 + 18 = \lambda \] Almost done. Let's substitute that into equation one to yield \[2x - 4 = \frac{-x^3}{2} + 9x \] rearranging and multplying by 2 yields \[x^3 - 14x - 8 = 0 \] which yields three solutions: \[x = \{4, \sqrt{2}-2, -\sqrt{2} - 2\} \] With dreams of simplicity, lets try x = 4... Then from equation 1, lambda = 2. Wonderfully, this also works in the second equation. Thus x = 4, y = -4, and z = 1/4(16+16) = 32/4 = 8.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh, oops. And therefore our answer is \[D = \sqrt{(4-2)^2 + (-4+2)^2 + (-8+9)^2} = \sqrt{4 + 4 +1} = 3 \] Forgive the typo, that should be z = -8 above...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

^= 3....

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!