"suppose \(c|(a+b)\) where \(a,b,c\in\mathbb{Z}\). then \(c|(pa+qb)\) where \(p,q\in\mathbb{Z}\)." can you really make such assumption!?
"for SOME integers \(p\) and \(q\)" i meant to add
i don't seem to get why x.x
Choose p=q=1
No we can't make such assumption.
like a=2, b=4, c=3 c|(a+b) -> 3|6 which is true but c|(2a+3b) -> 3|16 is false :(
\[ c | (a+b) \implies c | (1\cdot a + 1\cdot b) \]
\(3|(4+5)\) but 3 does not divide \((4\times 3+5 \times 5) \)
ooooh
so if the question is there exist at least one pair p,q such your statement is true, then yes.
But this question is asking for for all \(p,q \in \mathbb{Z}\), hence incorrect.
all or any*
ffm, pre-algebra says immediately below "for SOME p and q ..."
Hey, EDIT feature is a must!!!!
I have a tendency not to read any comment/answer before trying it on my own.
no kidding
"for SOME integers p and q" that's true.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!