Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

If CPUs were infinitely fast, and we had infinitely fast and infinitely large memory, would we benefit from optimization?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So you're talking about the point that computers pass us? What's that called again, (trying to think)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The technological singularity?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There you go

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

if you had a infinite amount of money, would you benefit from managing your money ??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@dumbcow maybe not

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohh, good one dumbcow (I always feel uncomfortable typing your name btw) ;)

OpenStudy (dumbcow):

isn't the point of optimization is to maximize limited resources....therefore optimization is obsolete with infinite resources...in my opinion

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So, theoretically, optimization is the maximization of infinite resources, correct? Thus would be unnecessary in your scenario

OpenStudy (anonymous):

haha, beat me to it dumbcow

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is there any resource on earth that's infinite?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nothing on earth is infinite if the earth itself will have a set limit of existence itself...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What about software that can be infinitely copied/reused with no sort of degredation, or even ideas?

OpenStudy (xishem):

Well, given that a resource must take up some sort of space, an infinite resource would take up infinite volume.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so, does a resource have to be tangible then?

OpenStudy (xishem):

Not necessarily. I feel that all resources take up some sort of "space", whether that space is volume or not. Let me try to rephrase.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

software and ideas certainly do take space

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i was referin to material of course

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ideas? How so? @agdg

OpenStudy (xishem):

Well, ideas can be stored in a few places: neurons, text, etc. But none of these is infinite.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@cshalvey don't they occupy minds? Don't minds have limited storage? I think the mind is a little different though...

OpenStudy (xishem):

An idea can exist without being stored in any of those places, but if it's not stored in any one of those places, does it actually exist? Since no one knows the idea?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right, the mind is absurdly hard to quantify - we have estimates, but no real hard data, ie GB of storage for instance

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Interesting Xishem...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

an idea can be used :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

without many thought to it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Also, if I have an idea, and I forget - does that idea necessarily cease to exist?

OpenStudy (xishem):

Crazy... I wonder if it's stored somewhere in the folds of your brain in some neurons somewhere that you just can't access.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Philosophy on the Math group :-D

OpenStudy (xishem):

Or I wonder if it's possible to completely erase an idea or thought from your mind?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think it has more to do with psychology :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think so Xishem - for instance studies on dreams, etc are more puzzling than helpful

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if you are talking about the mind

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Also deja vu

OpenStudy (anonymous):

deja vu :-D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Imma gonna give this question a medal - off topic be damned ;)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I thought deja vu was simply a glitch in your memory function or something...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

True, but it's also rooted a lot in memory they've found. Which is weird - because it's forward focused (present experiences 'remembered')

OpenStudy (xishem):

I'd be interested to see how you could affect certain memories that are stored in the brain. For instance, if you (physically) removed a neuron from a neuron group for a given memory, how would it affect that memory? Would it be like corrupted files on a computer, where they just couldn't be read, or would some completely unrelated memory take its place?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think it's more organic than that - the concept of 'relearning' how to walk for instance - neurons regrow in new paths...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And then there's actual memory loss - amnesia - which spontaneously can go away, or never go away

OpenStudy (xishem):

Like if you pull the last bit off of 1011, it changes from 11 to 5. cshalvey: Hmm, possibly. It'd be interesting to see how different memory groups relate to eachother.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

memory loss is actually caused by the brain becoming smoother

OpenStudy (anonymous):

less wrinkly

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right, a degradation right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mhm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

humans are different would be different computers where humans can relearn things humans can forget things and remember again computers they hold things in for a terminally if they break ( they are doomed forever until fixed)

OpenStudy (xishem):

That's just because the system that humans use to find data is... primitive compared to computers.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well, this was fun everyone - but I'm off to bed - knackered great question adgd, interesting convo mth, Xishem, dumbcow

OpenStudy (anonymous):

k bb gngn

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol with so many ppl answering i felt like i did something wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A quick responce to the question "what is infinite on earth?" Data.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

.....

OpenStudy (xishem):

That's a pretty broad term. Specify?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Or was that already said? :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, if you think about it, everything around us is made up of data. Specificaly atoms and cells.

OpenStudy (xishem):

So are there infinite atoms and cells?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Technically... yes. Untill we find a limit to space, and time. :|

OpenStudy (xishem):

We haven't NOT found a limit. I don't think you can automatically assume that space and time are infinite.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And then there is Pi (\[\pi\]). Which to my current understanding is infinite. Thereby providing infinite data.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah! And Energy is also infinite.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isn't the concept of infinite and infinitesimal relative?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol numbers

OpenStudy (xishem):

Just because pi has an infinite number of digits doesn't mean all of those digits are stored somewhere. Pi is only an abstraction humans have made for the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. It has no meaning.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

energy is not infinite

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mth3v4, Energy cannot be created or destroyed. So in theory, we will never gain more, or lose any. Doesn't that make it infinite?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am talking in reference to the physical world. Imagine a creature so small lets say made up of just an element or nearly an element's size wouldn't the term infinitesimal and infinite have different meaning for the creature.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

according to the laws of newton not so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it is not a matter of destroying or not destroying

OpenStudy (xishem):

The energy will be around for an infinite amount of time, but you don't have infinite energy.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Xishern, I understand that it's nothing more than a numeric value, I am just trying to think of concepts that are infinite.

OpenStudy (xishem):

If you have 5 everlasting dollar bills, you still can't pay for something that costs $10.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mth3v4, Can you please explain?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i am not reffering to conservation of energy

OpenStudy (xishem):

Energy would be infinite resource, certainly.

OpenStudy (xishem):

*an infinite resource

OpenStudy (xishem):

However, it's not infinite on Earth.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

True.

OpenStudy (xishem):

Well, actually, assume that Earth were a closed system (which it's not). No energy can escape, so therefore, you could continue using the energy over and over, yes?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Correct.

OpenStudy (xishem):

But it's impossible to create a completely closed system.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i was reffering to law 1 of motion i think i forgot

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its one of them :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

closed system infinite earth i would agree infinite energy

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but world going to end who know when (not in my time of course)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol this question became such an attraction

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well i gtg now nice talking to you every1 :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mth3v4, I have gone over Newtons laws, and I cant seem to find the one you are refering to...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Isee, well perhaps we can discuss this later :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There was a interesting question that this question reminds me of, "Given an infinite number of monkeys and an infinite amount of time, would one of them write Hamlet?"

OpenStudy (xishem):

With no typewriters, of course not.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Indeed, and I suppose the correct answer would be yes (if they did have typewriters), It's just that it would take "forever".

OpenStudy (xishem):

Hell, one monkey given a typewriter and infinite time would write Hamlet.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes this is actually http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Now the question is, would it take a shorter time if there is one monkey? Or a longer time if there were many?

OpenStudy (xishem):

Well, if you have two monkeys whacking away at it, you would get the result you wanted, on average, twice as fast.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!