V = u i + v j + w k and ∇= ∂╱∂x i + ∂╱∂y j + ∂╱∂z k that: (V∙∇)V = (1╱2)∇(V∙V)−V X (∇XV)
this looks scary, what is it?
i've been at this for 5 hours now
i just have to prove the left side equals the right side
u took calc 3 right?
took, taking, taught meself, and all that stuff, yeah
yea..figured since u helped me the other day you might be able to hand this
can we clean it up some with a b c? V = ui + vj + wk ∇= ai + bj + ck ------------------ = au i +bv j +cw k
so a b and c are the partials correct?
yes (au +bv +cw) <u,v,k> is the left side then
right
so then it comes out to (au^2 + bv^2+ cw^2
not quite, that dot is a scalar, not a vector so its applied to all the vector parts to stretch or shrink it to fit V.V = |V|^2 |V|^2 = u^2+v^2+w^2
gotcha...distribute it
edit:\[\frac{1}{2}*(V.V)=\frac{ u^2+v^2+w^2}{2}\]
this is scaled to our gradient for that first part on the right
isn't it 1/2 the gradient times V dot V?
grad x V is: a b c u v w x = bw-vc y = -(aw-uc) z = av-bu and to cross that with V again we get: u v w bw-vc uc-aw av-bu x = v(av-bu) - w(uc-aw) y = -(u(av-bu)-w(bw-vc)) z = u(uc-aw) - v(bw-vc)
yes, and V.V is just: u^2 + v^2 + w^2
u v w u v w --------------- u^2 + v^2 + w^2
i think i got all the parts ready :)
\[(au+bv+cw)(u\bar i+v\bar j+w\bar k)=...\] \[...\frac{u^2+v^2+w^2}{2}(a\bar i+b\bar j+c\bar k)-((av^2-buv -wuc+aw^2)\bar i\]\[+(-uav+bu^2+bw^2-wvc)\bar j+ (u^2c-auw - vbw + v^2c)\bar k\] this look about right so far? :)
its hard to say...b/c i been doing it partials and u v and w
but...the setup looks correct from what i can decifer
a b c just stand in for partials to make it cleam up
then yes...it appears to be correct...it's only the right hand side of the equation right?
the first line is the lhs; the rest is a bit lengthy and had to split it up some
if we multiply it all by 2 we get rid of the fraction
oh okay..yea
\[<(2au^2+2buv+2cuw),(2auv+2bv^2+2cwv),(2auw+2bvw+2cw^2)>\] is our LHS written out as its vector component stuff
lets try to work up the RHS to match it
alright...i'm gonna try and re copy this for my homework in long hand without the a b and c lol
\[<au^2,bv^2,cw^2>-etc\] \[<(au^2-2av^2+2buv +2wuc-2aw^2),\]\[(bv^2+2uav-2bu^2-2bw^2+2wvc),\]\[(cw^2-2u^2c+2auw +2vbw -2v^2c)>\] with any luck is how the RHS is looking after combining it all together
what is wuc?
as long as components wise we zero out, it should be proofed then au^2- 2au2 -2av^2+2buv-2buv +2wuc - 2cuw-2aw^2 = 0 wu is V parts, and c is a partial
nevermind lol....partial of w u over z
-au^2 -2av^2 -2aw^2 = 0 might need to rechk the math in all this, but this is the basic concept that im thinking of
yea i'm getting lost
trying to type it out with the partials
V = <u,v,w> g = <a,b,c> (V∙g)V = (1╱2)g(V∙V)−V X (gXV) (V∙g) = au+bv+cw (au+bv+cw)V = < au^2+bvu+cwu, auv+bv^2+cwv, auw+bvw+cw^2> is our LHS ............................................ (1╱2)g(V∙V) (V∙V) = v^2+u^2+w^2 (1╱2)(v^2+u^2+w^2) = v^2/2 + u^2/2 + w^2/2 (1╱2)(V∙V)g = av^2/2 + au^2/2 + aw^2/2 , bv^2/2 + bu^2/2 + bw^2/2 , cv^2/2 +cu^2/2 + cw^2/2 .......................................................... − V X (gXV) gxV: a b c v u w ----- x = bw-cu y = cv-aw z = au-bv -V x that is bw-cu cv-aw au-bv -v -u -w --------------------- x = -wcv+aw^2 + au^2 -bvu y = -vau+bv^2 +bw^2-cuw z = -ubw+cu^2 + cv^2-awv ugh lol -------------------------- to get rid of the /2 *2 it all < 2au^2+2bvu+2cwu, 2auv+2bv^2+2cwv, 2auw+2bvw+2cw^2> = = <av^2 + au^2 + aw^2 , bv^2 + bu^2 + bw^2 , cv^2 +cu^2 + cw^2> + <-2wcv+2aw^2 +2au^2 -2bvu, -2vau+2bv^2 +2bw^2 -2cuw, -2ubw +2cu^2 + 2cv^2 -2awv >
now compare component parts: 2au^2+2bvu+2cwu = av^2 + au^2 + aw^2-2wcv+2aw^2 +2au^2 -2bvu ? au^2 +2cwu = av^2 + aw^2-2wcv+2aw^2 +2au^2 ? u(au +2cw) = a(v^2 + w^2+2w^2) -2wcv +2au^2 ? yeah, where do you get these problems at anyhoos?
lol...meteorology major
sorry i'm trying to copy it all down lol
its hard to see the difference between u and v when their close tother
the wolf gives me this for VxgxV lets see if its does good with the rest too \[<-a u^2+b u v+c v w-a w^2, a u v-b v^2+c u w-b w^2, -c u^2-c v^2+b u w+a v w>\]
alright i'm all caught up writing lol
yea...from what i got..this does not equal each other lol
3 terms per component on the left hand side to 5 terms per component in the rhs
\[<\frac a2u^2+\frac a2v^2+\frac a2w^2 , \frac b2u^2+\frac b2v^2+\frac b2w^2, \frac c2u^2+\frac c2v^2+\frac c2w^2>\]\[<a u^2-b u v-c v w+a w^2, -a u v+b v^2-c u w+b w^2, c u^2+c v^2-b u w-a v w>\] \[av^2+buv+cwv=( \frac{au^2+ av^2+ aw^2+2au^2-2b u v-2c v w+2a w^2}{2})\] \[2av^2+2buv+2cwv= au^2+ av^2+ aw^2+2au^2-2b u v-2c v w+2a w^2\] \[av^2+4buv+4cwv= au^2+ aw^2+2au^2+2a w^2\] yeah, is it spose to proof correct? or is this just some sort of manuvuer on their part?
the left side should equal the right side exactly
try with some random easy numbers maybe, or functions lol just to test
V = x,x^2,x^3 g = 1,2x,3x^2 at x=1
V = 1,1,1 g = 1,2,3
(v.g)v = (1+2+3)<1,1,1> = <6,6,6> lol, nice 1/2 g = (1/2, 1 , 3/2)(3) = <3/2, 3 , 9/2> <6,6,6> = <3/2, 3 , 9/2> - stuff <12,12,12> = <3, 6 , 9> - 2*stuff -3 -6 -9 ---------------- <9,6,3> = -2*stuff <-18,-12,-6> = stuff
stuff = vxgxv 1,1,1 1,2,3 ----- x=1 y=-2 z=1 1,-2,1 1, 1, 1 ------- x=-3 y= 0 z= 3 <-18,-9,-3> = <-3,0,3> ??
so the answer above is correct as it stands?
when i plug in some random function for V and grad it to g; this is what I get; so I dont see how it is spose to be true as a proof according to what youve listed
it would just be weird b/c i have 5 of these to prove...and all 4 have matched perfectly
<9,6,3> = -2*stuff /-2 -------- <-9/2, -3, -3/2> = stuff but still; thats not a match
alright...i gotta work out some stuff with wolf then lol
good luck :)
u still around?
im around
i just emailed my professor..this is what i got back
yep. they are supposed to match. Come by my office tomorrow with what you have done, and I can look at see where you are going wrong. Every year students think the 1/2 is an error, but it is correct......usually people go wrong when taking the derivative of u^2.
now...i'm really confused b/c i don't see where i'm taking any derivatives
hmmm, ...
are v, u, amd w function of x?
gradV = V' right?
i mean...exactly the way the question is written...is what i have
del operator?
is what she calls it
so grad is the operator on V and not a specific vector ....
del(V.V) is not what I had in mind at the begining
but then what is V.del? del of what?
or is V.del, just V' ?
\[\frac{d}{dx}u+\frac{d}{dx}v+\frac{d}{dx}w=<u',v',w'>\]
well, with the right parts that is :)
well del is just = to partial/partial x etc.
(V∙∇)V = (1╱2)∇(V∙V)−V X (∇XV) let's do it term by term....... Letting V=(u(x,y,z),v(x,y,z),w(x,y,z)) and start with the term 12∇(V⋅V). V⋅V=u2+v2+w2 and this is a scalar quantity. Then ∇(u2+v2+w2) is a vector quantity, and as above, is equal to: [∂∂x(u2+v2+w2)i+∂∂y(u2+v2+w2)j+∂∂z(u2+v2+w2)k] in calculating each component of this vector, we will use subscripts to indicate partial differentiation wrt the subscripted variable. We have [(2uux+2vvx+2wwx)i+(2uuy+2vvy+2wwy)j+(2uuz+2vvz+2wwz)k] So multiplying by the 1/2 will remove all these 2s meaning: 12∇(V⋅V)=[(uux+vvx+wwx)i+(uuy+vvy+wwy)j+(uuz+vvz+wwz)k] Next we want to deal with the term: V×(∇×V) First we calculate ∇×V=(wy−vz)i+(uz−wx)j+(vx−uy)k Next we calculate V×[(wy−vz)i+(uz−wx)j+(vx−uy)k] =[v(vx−uy)−w(uz−wx)]i+[w(wy−vz)−u(vx−uy)]j +[u(uz−wx)−v(wy−vz)]k and this equals V×(∇×V). Now we do the subtraction. In the i component we get: [uux+vvx+wwx−v(vx−uy)+w(uz−wx)]i which is equal to [uux+vuy+wuz]i Looking good? Let's do the j and k component now: [uuy+vvy+wwy−w(wy−vz)+u(vx−uy)]j which is equal to [uvx+vvy+wvz]j and at long last, the k component... [uuz+vvz+wwz−u(uz−wx)+v(wy−vz)]k which is equal to [uwx+vwy+wwz]k THEREFORE we have shown that the right hand side reduces to the vector: [uux+vuy+wuz]i+[uvx+vvy+wvz]j+[uwx+vwy+wwz]k Now let's stop here and think for a bit. V⋅∇=u∂∂x+v∂∂y+w∂∂z and this is an operator which acts on vectors to the right of it, if you like, so we get: (V⋅∇)V=[u∂∂xu+v∂∂yu+w∂∂zu]i+[u∂∂xv+v∂∂yv+w∂∂zv]j +[u∂∂xw+v∂∂yw+w∂∂zw]k Notice that this is exactly what we just proved, therefore the identity has been verified.
\[V = u i + v j + w k \] \[∇= \frac{∂}{∂x} i + \frac{∂}{∂y} j +\frac{∂}{∂z} k\] \[(V∙∇)= \frac{∂u}{∂x} + \frac{∂v}{∂y} +\frac{∂w}{∂z}\] \[(V∙∇)V= \left(\frac{∂u}{∂x}u + \frac{∂v}{∂y}u +\frac{∂w}{∂z}u\right)i+\left(\frac{∂u}{∂x}v + \frac{∂v}{∂y}v +\frac{∂w}{∂z}v\right)j+\left(\frac{∂u}{∂x}w + \frac{∂v}{∂y}w +\frac{∂w}{∂z}w\right)k\] ----------------------------------- \[∇(V∙V)= \left(\frac{∂}{∂x}u^2i + \frac{∂}{∂y}v^2j +\frac{∂}{∂z}w^2k\right)\] \[∇(V∙V)= \left(\frac{∂u}{∂x}2ui + \frac{∂v}{∂y}2vj +\frac{∂w}{∂z}2wk\right)\] \[∇(V∙V)/2= \left(\frac{∂u}{∂x}ui + \frac{∂v}{∂y}vj +\frac{∂w}{∂z}wk\right)\] ------------------------------------ so far −V X (∇XV)
\[-VxV=<0,0,0>\]so i have to wonder about that part :) \[(∇xV)=\frac{∂}{∂y}w-\frac{∂}{∂z}v,\ \frac{∂}{∂z}w-\frac{∂}{∂x}u,\ \frac{∂}{∂x}u - \frac{∂}{∂y} v \] \[-Vx(∇xV)=(\frac{∂w}{∂y}-\frac{∂v}{∂z},,\ \frac{∂u}{∂x} - \frac{∂v}{∂y} \] \[\ x=\frac{∂}{∂x}(wu)+\ \frac{∂}{∂x}(uv) - \frac{∂}{∂y}(v^2)-\frac{∂}{∂z}(w^2)\] \[\ x=\frac{∂u}{∂x}w+\frac{∂w}{∂x}u+\ \frac{∂u}{∂x}v+\ \frac{∂v}{∂x}u - \frac{∂v}{∂y}2v-\frac{∂w}{∂z}2w\] if this is right, its a killer trying to keep track of it all
yea...u see the link i just sent you.....a guy figured it all out...i can't make sense of it though
yeah, james is smart that way
well the other guy if u scroll down solved it
but i can' t understand it
ok, so we seem to be good up to that -v x del x v part; right?
do you understand the notations?\[du/dx=u_x\]
if so: \[del(x)V=\begin{pmatrix}x&y&z\\d_x&d_y&d_z\\u&v&w\end{pmatrix}\] \[x=(w_y-v_z)\] \[y=(u_z-w_x)\] \[z=(v_x-u_y)\] Vx(that stuff): \begin{pmatrix}x&y&z\\u&v&w\\(w_y-v_z)&(u_z-w_x)&(v_x-u_y) \end{pmatrix} \[x=(vv_x-vu_y-wu_z+ww_x)\] \[y=(uu_y-uv_x+ww_y-wv_z)\] \[z=(vw_y-vv_z-uu_z+uw_x)\]
i can make it out, i just cant seem to get a good explanation on it tho
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!