Why is W not a subspace of the vector space? W is the set of all linear functions ax+b in c(continous functions)
I dont know if that made sense but in simpler english W a linear function isnt a subspace of continous functions
idk y cuz linear functions are continous so liek it is weird
I think basically it wants you to figure out somehow how this linear function isnt a linear function either when multiplied by a scalar or when added to another function
is it specifically the set of all functions of degree 1 ?
...or is anything less that degree 1 allowed ?
umm idk it says ax+b where a cant equal 0
the only thing I can think is that this is specifically the set of all polynomials of degree exactly 1, and we may have the situation\[ax+b+(-ax)+c=b+c\]which would take it out if that space by lowering the degree if a and b can't be zero then we're done :D
but that's different than what you said.... ax+b can't be 0 you say? what's that mean? lol
no "a" can't equal 0
oh, then we're done
ok Thanks :D
Look who's back :P
Hey
Howz it going?
its going wish it wld be better but it is fine
I'm already done with my course :P
Oh well I am very far behind :D
Yeah, next time, you should hang out with me when taking classes.
Well i may be taking a break next term I may just take one course
I dont really like linear algebra
Calc is easy and fun it is more concrete while this is abstract for me
lol
Oh we r bothering turing Sorry
Yeah I feel the same way only since I started using this site have I felt more comfortable with it the result of practice of course
linear algebra I mean*
I am gonna take abstract algebra one of these days and like i am nervous
I know my brain wont be able to follow that
I've never even looked at that myself...
Turing I have another question
Turing found this great page http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/LinAlg/VectorSpaces.aspx The key fact for W not being a subspace is it says ax+b where a cant equal 0 to be a subspace, we need to satisfy a bunch of axioms, including There is a special object in V, denoted 0 and called the zero vector, such that for all u in V we have u+0=u so we need f(x)+ 0 = f(x) where 0 is in W. Of course, in this context, 0= 0x+0, which is not allowed because a cannot be 0. So W fails with this property
So u r saying something diff than turing
You r saying that a diff axiom fails
You can fail for more than one reason. But when I went through the list given in the link, it looks like W fails with (e) and (f)
okkkkk I see
I have one more that i dont understand
W is a set of all vectorsin R^3 whose compnents are pythagorean triple
doesn't that fail for u+v is in W e.g. given u= (3,4,5), v= (5,12,13) is (8,16,18) in W?
phi is saying the same thing more articulately
kkk i get it
ok Thanks guys :D U r awesome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!