Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors... Find 1-dimensional subspaces of R2 invariant under the linear transformations given by the following matrix: [1 2;-3 -6]
so you want the vectors v of the form: \[A\vec{v} = \lambda \vec{v}\] for the above matrix (which we call A) and some constant lambda. Do you know how to solve problems like this?
Or you could just do it by looking at it, as 2x2 matrices aren't too hard to see through. Up to you.
only just scratched he surface of eigenvalues/vectors but from my notes you rearrange \[Av =\lambda v\] to \[(A-\lambda I)v=0\] then find \[\det(A-\lambda I)=0\] and I get \[\lambda = 0, -5\] so what do I do now
The determinant is \[(1-\lambda)( -6 - \lambda) +6 = -6 -\lambda + 6\lambda + \lambda^2 + 6 = \lambda^2 + 5\lambda \] so you're correct. The matrix that came from is \[\left[\begin{matrix}1-\lambda & 2\\-3 &-6- \lambda\end{matrix}\right]\] Plug in lambda = 0, and solve \[\left[\begin{matrix}1 & 2\\-3 &-6\end{matrix}\right]\left(\begin{matrix} a \\b\end{matrix}\right)= 0\] You get two equations. First, \[a + 2b = 0\] second, \[-3a - 6b = 0\] these happen to give the same results, namely a = -2b, and so therefore your eigenvector is \[\left(\begin{matrix}-2 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)\] and its multiples.
Ohh ok thanks, I haven't quite covered the eigenvectors yet but this makes complete sense! there's also another eigenvector [1 -3] which by the look of it you plug in the 5 as lambda in your 2nd step and solve. Thanks again!
Exactly. Therefore, the subspaces defined by those two vectors and their multiples are invariant under the transformation.
Just out of curiosity, what was you other method you described earlier, about reading off the 2x2 matrix?
I just meant looking at the thing and trying to see without doing any computation. It's not so bad sometimes with 2x2 matrices but it's nearly impossible any other time.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!