Suppose that I have an infinite collection of open intervals \(O_n\) whose lengths are \(1/2^{n-1}\), where \(n\in\mathbb{N}\). Would then\[O=\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}O_{n}\]have a length of \(2\)? If so, does this imply that\[O^{c}=\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty}O_{n}^{c}\]has infinite length?
i say that \(O\) would have length \(2\) because \(1+1/2+1/2^2+...=2\).
confused. you say the lengths are each \[\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}\] but who says they are disjoint?
hmm very good point
suppose the sets are the intevals \[(\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}, \frac{1}{2^{n-1}})\] then since they are nested the union would be the first (largest) one
i forgot to add that the open intervals are centered at unique rational numbers, but your point still stands.
i meant of course \[(-\frac{1}{2^{n-1}}, \frac{1}{2^{n-1}})\]
i could argue that the greatest length the union of these intervals can attain is of 2, though.
actually i think it would be one
\[(-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})\] has length 1
that'd be the smallest (given they're all nested, like you described).
i think that would be the largest
if they're disjoint, then the total length would be 2.
wait... hmm...
yes if they were disjoint you could add them up as you did in a geometric series get 2
gotta run, good luck
kk thx
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!