http://books.google.com/books?id=CUbdMDUHRlUC&pg=PA101&dq=skydiver+125+terminal+velocity+15+seconds&hl=en&sa=X&ei=puNDT7a5HsWatwf2mq2BDA&ved=0CEwQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=skydiver%20125%20terminal%20velocity%2015%20seconds&f=false number 32 .... hmmm
show that q(t) is a solution to the differential equation. do I try to undo the diffy Q? which I havent been able to do yet. or try yo up the qt into it?
I can't see!
its in braille :)
just feel around
Oh. Ok. Lemme skim around with my computer screen.
Aw. all I feel is my computer screen getting smudgy fingerprints everywhere.
...take this pebble from my hand, grasshopper
hmmm... i can't see that small exponent
1/Ck_2?
\[(k_1+k^2t)q'+\frac{1}{C}q=E(t)\] E(t) = a constant; q(0) = \(q_0\), another constant \[q(t)=E_0C+(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{k_1+k_2t}\right)^{(1/Ck_2)}\]
amistre why do you have to post ling I know nothing about what is C?
is C=C(t)?
lingo*
C is capacitance; its constant as well
Resistance is variable
ok cool let me try
i think ive been looking at it too hard; trying to undo the diffyQ is a nightmare so I think it wasnt me to up the q(t) into it as proof
wants .. wasnt at least i got the same keys this time :)
\[q(t)=\frac{\int\limits_{}^{}e^{\int\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{k_1+k_2t} dt} E(t) dt +C}{e^{\int\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{k_1+k_2t} dt}}\]
\[q(t)=E_0C+(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{k_1+k_2t}\right)^{(1/Ck_2)}\] \[q'(t)=(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{C(k_1+k_2t)}\right)^{\frac{1-Ck_2}{Ck_2}}\]
yeah i missed my C
\[q(t)=\frac{\int\limits\limits_{}^{}e^{\int\limits\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)} dt} E(t) dt +C}{e^{\int\limits\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)} dt}}\]
oops and that other C is a different C
E(t) is constant, so it can be pulled out
\[q(t)=\frac{\int\limits\limits\limits_{}^{}e^{\int\limits\limits\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)} dt} E(t) dt +C_1}{e^{\int\limits\limits\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)} dt}}\]
that other "C" cant be put there until you int up the top anyhoos
unless of course your just putting it there as a primer lol
..when im done, this will go here ...
\[q(t)=\frac{E(t) \int\limits_{}^{} e^{\int\limits_{}^{} \frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)} dt} dt+C_1}{e^{\int\limits_{}^{}\frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)} dt}}\]
\[(k_1+k_2t)(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{C(k_1+k_2t)}\right)^{\frac{1-Ck_2}{Ck_2}}+E_0+C^{-1}(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{k_1+k_2t}\right)^{(1/Ck_2)}=E_0 \]maybe?
\[q(t)=\frac{E_0 \int\limits_{}^{}e^{\ln(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{k^2}} dt+C_1}{e^{\ln(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{k^2}}}\]
did i make a mistake?
\[1/Ck_2\] but looks right so far
\[q(t)=\frac{E_0 \int\limits_{}^{}(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{k^2} dt+C_1}{(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{k^2}}\]
darn i'm missing my C again
\[q(t)=\frac{E_0 \int\limits\limits_{}^{}(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{Ck^2} dt+C_1}{(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{Ck^2}}\]
are we to assume CK^2 is never -1 ?
\[q(t)=E_0C+(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{k_1+k_2t}\right)^{(1/Ck_2)}\] \[q'(t)=(q_0-E_0 C)\left(\frac{k_1}{k_1+k_2t}\right)^{(1-Ck_2)/Ck_2}C^{-1}k^{-2}\frac{-k_1}{(k_1+k_2t)^2}\] ugh thats a mess
problem doesnt say we can make that assumption
well wouldn't we have two possible cases then for when 1/Ck^2=-1 and then for whenever it equals anything else?
it looks like answer assumes it is not -1
Ck_2 is just a constant within the formula
there is no Ck^2 :)
not an arbitrary constant tho; one that is a result within the equation
Capacitance
whatever
that is what i meant i just got distracted
but still if that constant=-1 then we have another case to worry about unless i made a mistake
id have to look at it fresh later on, at the moment all i see is headache :/
\[\int\limits_{}^{}u^{-1} du=\ln|u|+C ; \int\limits_{}^{}u^n du =\frac{u^{n+1}}{n+1}+C , n \neq -1\]
i have a headache too thanks a lot i do want to help with your problem though so i will continue to look at it and i think i will do it on paper first because typing it on screen i lose a lot of numbers and letters
yeah, typing aint condusive to mathing
http://books.google.com/books?id=BnArjLNjXuYC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=suppose+an+rc+circuit+has+a+variable+resistor+E(t)+q(t)&source=bl&ots=_dS_jauZTi&sig=GD45MrxPWHcUomPEEotPHFYMlNg&hl=en&sa=X&ei=v1NET9avOJDVgAea9p2hBA&ved=0CEgQ6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=suppose%20an%20rc%20circuit%20has%20a%20variable%20resistor%20E(t)%20q(t)&f=false this has the same problem, but includes pages with material about it as well
i think i'm getting somwhere
nope i'm having trouble ...
that constant I put in there they have no new constants except the q_0...
i can get this: \[q=E_0C+ \frac{q_0}{(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{Ck_2}}\]
i might got something ... \[R(t)=(k_1+k_2t)\ R'(t) = k_2\] \[R(t)q'+\frac{1}{C}q=E(t)\] \[q'+\frac{1}{CR(t)}q=\frac{E(t)}{R(t)}\] \[exp(\int \frac{1}{CR(t)}dt)q=\int \frac{E(t)}{R(t)}exp(\int \frac{1}{CR(t)}dt)dt\] \[exp(\frac{1}{Ck_2}ln(R(t))\ )q=\int ...\] \[R(t)^{1/Ck_2}\ q=\int \frac{E(t)}{R(t)}R(t)^{1/Ck_2} dt\] \[R(t)^{1/Ck_2}\ q=E(t)\int R(t)^{(1-Ck_2)/Ck_2} dt\] \[R(t)^{1/Ck_2}\ q=\frac{E(t)}{k_2}\left(\frac{R(t)^{(1-Ck_2+Ck_2)/Ck_2} }{(1-Ck_2+Ck_2)/Ck_2}+C_1 \right)\] \[R(t)^{1/Ck_2}\ q=\frac{E(t)}{k_2}\left(\frac{R(t)^{1/Ck_2} }{1/Ck_2}+C_1 \right)\] \[R(t)^{1/Ck_2}\ q=\frac{E(t)Ck_2R(t)^{1/Ck_2}}{k_2}+C_1\frac{E(t)}{k^2} \] \[R(t)^{1/Ck_2}\ q=E(t)CR(t)^{1/Ck_2}+C_1\frac{E(t)}{k^2} \] \[ q=E(t)C\ \cancel{R(t)^{1/Ck_2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}}+C_1\frac{E(t)}{k^2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}\ \] \[ q=E(t)C+C_1\frac{E(t)}{k^2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}\ \] is what i got so far
ok i will type what i did
\[q(0)=E_0C+C_1\frac{E_0}{k_2}(k_1+k_2(0))^{-1/Ck_2}=q_0\] \[C_1\frac{E_0}{k_2}(k_1)^{-1/Ck_2}=q_0-E_0C\] \[C_1(k_1)^{-1/Ck_2}=\frac{(q_0-E_0C)k_2}{E_0}\] \[C_1=\frac{(q_0-E_0C)k_2}{E_0}(k_1)^{1/Ck_2}\]
\[q=E(t)C+C_1\frac{E(t)}{k_2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}\] \[q=E_0C+\frac{(q_0-E_0C)k_2}{E_0}(k_1)^{1/Ck_2}\frac{E_0}{k_2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}\] \[q=E_0C+(q_0-E_0C)k_2(k_1)^{1/Ck_2}\frac{1}{k_2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}\] \[q=E_0C+(q_0-E_0C)(k_1)^{1/Ck_2}R(t)^{-1/Ck_2}\] almost got it :)
\[q'+\frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)}q=\frac{E_0}{k_1+k_2t}\] \[v=e^{\int \frac{1}{C(k_1+k_2t)}dt} \] \[v=e^{\frac{1}{C} \cdot \frac{1}{k_2} \ln(k_1+k_2t) }\] \[v=(k_1+k_2t)^{\frac{1}{Ck_2}}]\] So we have \[(vq)'=v \cdot \frac{E_0}{k_1+k_2t}\] Integrate both sides \[vq=\int\limits_{}^{}E_0 \cdot (k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{Ck_2}(k_1+k_2t)^{-1} dt \] \[vq=E_0 \int\limits_{}^{}(k_1+k_2t)^{\frac{1}{Ck_2}-1} dt\] \[vq=\frac{E_0}{k_2} \cdot \frac{(k_1+k_2t)^{\frac{1}{Ck_2}}}{\frac{1}{Ck_2}}+C_1\]
\[q=E_0C+(q_0-E_0C)\frac{(k_1)^{1/Ck_2}}{R(t)^{1/Ck_2}}\] \[q=E_0C+(q_0-E_0C)\left(\frac{(k_1)}{R(t)}\right)^{1/Ck_2}\] \[q=E_0C+(q_0-E_0C)\left(\frac{k_1}{k_1+k_2t}\right)^{1/Ck_2}\]
\[vq=E_0C(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{Ck_2}+C_1\] \[q=E_0C+\frac{C_1}{(k_1+k_2t)^\frac{1}{Ck_2}}\]
oh and i see we are given q(0)=q_0
yep :)
i completely ignored that part at first
well it looks like you got it... great job :( i wanted to win
ok i have to go back to my studies peace
thnx for the support ;)
the finished product ... yay!!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!