The family functions y=c1*e^x*cos(x)+c2*e^x*sin(x) is a general solution of y''-2y'+2y=0 Decide whether there is a member of the family that satisfies the boundary condition y(-pi/2)=0 and y(pi/2)=0
we want to look at the possible values of the constants c1 and c2 plug in the values into the equation and you will get a system if the system is solvable for a unique solution of c1 and c2, then that is your answer
I"ve worked it out, and obviously the cos(x) side of the equation is irrelevant. You end up with two equations 0=c2*e^x*sin(-pi/2) and 0=c2*e^x*cos(-pi/2). Works out to 0= -xe^(-pi/2) and 0=xe^(pi/2)
I'm having problem expressing it in the form y=(some equation here). I assume there are infinite solutions based a single parameter C. I just can't find what that value is
\[y(-\frac{\pi}2)=-c_1e^{-\frac\pi2}\cos(-\frac{\pi}2)+c_2e^{-\frac{\pi}2}\sin(-\frac{\pi}2)=-c_2e^{-\frac\pi2}=0\]\[y(-\frac{\pi}2)=-c_1e^{-\frac\pi2}\cos(-\frac{\pi}2)+c_2e^{\frac{\pi}2}\sin(\frac{\pi}2)=c_2e^{\frac\pi2}=0\]so it looks like c2 is trying to be zero, which I'm pretty sure means there is no such equation in the family.
oh that's all supposed to be positive pi/2 in the second line
\[y(-\frac{\pi}2)=-c_1e^{-\frac\pi2}\cos(-\frac{\pi}2)+c_2e^{-\frac{\pi}2}\sin(-\frac{\pi}2)=-c_2e^{-\frac\pi2}=0\]\[y(\frac{\pi}2)=-c_1e^{\frac\pi2}\cos(\frac{\pi}2)+c_2e^{\frac{\pi}2}\sin(\frac{\pi}2)=c_2e^{\frac\pi2}=0\]
hm... you make a point I'm not sure, let me think about it or perhaps @JamesJ can help
I thought it was 0 at first two, but my online homework disagrees :) thanks for the insight though
Right. So c1 can be anything and c2 = 0
Cool, nice and simple thanks James, and that feature is pretty cool :D
Yes, it is. I just hope no every man and his dog can mention me!
Also good, my question is how would I write that in terms of y=______ , though I agree your answer is much more intuitive
*not
I hear you brycoop: I believe you can write if you want to express that you can write\[y=te^x\cos x;t\in \mathbb R\]
y=c1*e^x*cos(x)
or yeah, same thing...
ehh webworks won't take it, which doesn't mean its wrong, I'll email my prof and see what she says, thanks a bunch guys
perhaps your webwork would be happier if you chose a random number for c, like c=1 have you tried that?
just needed to add a * forget how picky webworks can be with multiplication. Try to avoid being implicit in the future I suppose haha
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!