Verify the triangle inequality
whoops give me time to attache the file
did you try using wolframalpha?
||u +v || is less than or equal to ||u|| +||v||
I have no clue... I'm in A2/Trig not college :P I need a life
|<f,g>| <= |<f,f>|+|<g,g>|
sqrt(<f,g>) <= sqrt(<f,f>) + sqrt(<g,g>)
<f,g> = Integral (x*e^(-x),x,0,1)
noooo u dont sqrt the left hand side
we didnt do that last time
but last time we didn't have |<f,g>|
wait let me think
that is true but remeber what i sent u
sqrt((e-2)/e) <= sqrt(Integral(x^2,0,1)) + sqrt(Integral(e^(-2x),0,1))
Yes i did pippa, be patient and trust me on this one, please? I suck at linear algebra, but I know my topology....
By the way, that was a risky statement, im just gonna disappear, if i get this wrong now.
lol what was a risky statement? lol
i didnt follow what u did. i am soooo slow today
sqrt((e-2)/e) <= sqrt(1/3) + sqrt( (1/2)-( 1/(2e^2) ) )
want me to write that out? The rsiky statement was. I said I knew my topology, if I get this wrong, that means I don't even know topology and I have no right to speak whatsoever.
who cares i will correct u if i feel so lol
haha u dont have to feel responsible
Anyway the right gives u: 1.23487 the left side gives u: 0.51.. 0.51 <= 1.23, so the inequality holds
as was to be proven. Where did u get lost?
idk i was doing smth diff arrrgghhhhhh i am f* stupid
Do my eyes deceive me? Pippa, who doesn't like my language on skype?
ya sorry
btw u're not stupid. ||u|| = ||<u,u>|| = sqrt(<u,u>)
So: ||<u,u>|| = sqrt(<u,u>) ||<f,g>|| = sqrt(<f,g>)
ya ur right now i see it :D
<f,g> = Int (f*g) from 0 to 1, so ||<f,g>|| = sqrt(<f,g>) = sqrt(Int(f*g))
ok good
hey thanks
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!