Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

i got this question: Prove a cross (b cross c)= (a dot c)b-(a dot b)c

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what i tried doing was working the LHS, i first did b cross c, the i did a cross (bxc), i dont know if that how i should proceed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then for the RHS, i did first a dot c, but i am comfused as to whether the b on the ouside of the parenthese is distrubued into the dot product or not.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

a.c is a scalar; so is a.b

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[(<a_1,a_2,a_3,...,a_n>.<b_1,b_2,b_3,...,b_n>)<c_1,c_2,c_3,...,c_n>\] \[(a_1b_1+a_2b_2+a_3b_3+...+a_nb_n)<c_1,c_2,c_3,...,c_n>\] \[<a_1b_1c_1+a_2b_2c_1+a_3b_3c_1+...+a_nb_nc_1,a_1b_1c_2+a_2b_2c_2+a_3b_3c_2+...+a_nb_nc_2,\] \[\hspace{15em} ...,a_1b_1c_n+a_2b_2c_n+a_3b_3c_n+...+a_nb_nc_n>\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i received a text from a friend who is taking the class wth me, and its an extremely long proof

OpenStudy (amistre64):

it can be, yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what do you mean "it can be"

OpenStudy (amistre64):

as opposed to "it cant be" i would say that its more probable than not.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i was looking at some sources on the web, and it talked about the possiblility that we could use symmtery to prove this, by working with the x-axis or somehting like that

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[(a.c)b\] \[<a_1c_1b_1+a_2c_2b_1 +a_3c_3b_1+...+a_nc_nb_1, a_1c_1b_2 +a_2c_2b_2 +a_3c_3b_2+...+a_nc_nb_2,\] \[\hspace{15em} ...,a_1c_1b_n+a_2c_2b_n+a_3c_3b_n+...+a_nc_nb_n>\] \[(a.b)c-(a.c)b\] \[\binom{(a_1b_1c_1+a_2b_2c_1+a_3b_3c_1+...+a_nb_nc_1)}{-(a_1c_1b_1+a_2c_2b_1 +a_3c_3b_1+...+a_nc_nb_1)},\binom{(a_1b_1c_2+a_2b_2c_2+a_3b_3c_2+...+a_nb_nc_2)}{-(a_1c_1b_2 +a_2c_2b_2 +a_3c_3b_2+...+a_nc_nb_2)},\] \[\hspace{15em} ...,\binom{(a_1b_1c_n+a_2b_2c_n+a_3b_3c_n+...+a_nb_nc_n)}{-(a_1c_1b_n+a_2c_2b_n+a_3c_3b_n+...+a_nc_nb_n)}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

if you can get the left to look like that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think you are misinterpreting. The cross product, a specific form of an outer product, is only for vectors in R^3. This means that if you were to assume a general form you wouldn't assume \[\vec{A}=(a_1,a_2,...a_n)\] You would assume: \[\vec{\Omega}=(\Omega_1,\Omega_2, \Omega_3)\] This should help. Also, wikipeidia quote: "In mathematics, the cross product, vector product, or Gibbs vector product is a binary operation on two vectors in three-dimensional space. It results in a vector which is perpendicular to both of the vectors being multiplied and therefore normal to the plane containing them. The name "cross product" is derived from the cross symbol "×" that is often used to designate this operation; the alternative name "vector product" emphasizes the vector (rather than scalar) nature of the result. It has many applications in mathematics, engineering and physics."

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!