One more proof question. malevolence19 if you could be so kind.
any thoughts?
This one is a bit tougher haha
yea its a fun class let me tell you
I honestly don't know too much about sums of subsequences being convergent being related to absolute convergence of a series :/
Lets think about it outloud
Im wondering if i have to prove if i prove that bn is a cauchy sequence
For b_n to be a subsequence of a_n then it must have the property that: \[b_k=\left\{ a_{n_k}| n_1 < n_2 < ... < n_k \in \mathbb{Z}^+\right\}\]
Maybe I'm going too basic D:
Im not sure. He posted this friday and we have a week to get it done so there is a possibility he hasnt covered it in class yet
Do you know abel's test?
Could you say that \(a_n\) is a subsequence of itself? Thus it's convergent. You still need to show absolute convergence, but this might be a good first step if it works.
I mean we did just talk about rearrangement of series
Absolute convergence would follow from the fact that \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n\]converges. Since it converges at infinity, it's absolutely convergent.
Just found this, it might help. http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=209040
it does. thanks
you're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!