Determine the values m, M, a, b, and c such that the function f(x) satisfies the hypothesis of the MVT on the interval [-4,2]. sketch a graph of f.
mx+a; when -4
i know that the MVT says if f on [a,b] is continuous and differentiable, then there is an x=c within (a,b) such that f'(c)= f(b)-f(a) / b-a
f'(c) = mx+a (first condition) a = -4, b = 2 (interval a to b) f(b)-f(a) / 2+4 = mx-4 f(b)-f(a)/6 = mx - 4
or f(b)-f(a) = 6(mx - 4) hmm im kinda confused now
i know the feeling
do you know anyone on the site who's good at this kind of problem?
@Zarkon @TuringTest can u guys take a look?
I assume that is supposed to be ,x+a when \[-4\le x\le 2\]? (you have -2)
mx+a *
the negative 2 is correct
Oh I misread sorry
I get it now...
this is more tedious than hard.
you need to make f continuous and differentiable.
looks like c and b need to be zero
why? because they aren't (-)?
to be continuous you need \[\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=f(0)=0\]
\[\lim_{x\to 0^{+}}f(x)=\lim_{x\to 0^{+}}(Mx+c)=M\cdot 0+c\] this must be 0 thus \(c=0\)
ok. but then how do you find M? it could be anything in the interval, right?
you get M from the differentiability condition.
what does that mean?
\[f'(0)=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}\] must exist
\[f'(0)=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{f(0+h)-f(0)}{h}\]
does M=2 ? (I'm trying to follow along as well..)
looking at the limit as h goes to zero from the right \[\lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{f(0+h)-f(0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{Mh-0}{h}=M\]
\[\lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{f(0+h)-f(0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{h^2+2h-0}{h}=2\] thus, as TT stated, M=2
ok, I need to start from a beginning. I'm lost as to how we got there. so if f(x)=x^2+2x+b when -2<x<0 first, i find f'(x) in the interval? f'(x)=2x+2, right? f'(x)=0 when x=-1?
for get a - sign on the limit \[\lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{f(0+h)-f(0)}{h}=\lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{h^2+2h-0}{h}=2\]
Thank you Zarkon for yet another brilliant explanation :D (sorry if I interrupted it, I just wanted to make sure I understood)
not at all.
it's all good TT :)
I'm sorry, i looked at it again, and I'm more confused. I get how you find M, but not c
what is the limit of f(x) as x goes to 0 from the right?
0?
and as x goes to zero from the left ?
no holes, so it's 0, right?
sorry no it's c
so, is a=0 as well?
remember what a typed above... \[\lim_{x\to 0^{+}}f(x)=\lim_{x\to 0^{+}}(Mx+c)=M\cdot 0+c=c\]
Oook! so c is the limit.
I messed up zarkons explanation, let me try again...
what is the limit of f as x goes to zero from the left? (that is when f(x)=x^2+2x+b)
is it b? or is it f'(x)? =2x+2?
right, and the value of f(0) is defined to be...?
b
it's b...
no f(0) is defined to be zero, yes?
if x=0 f(0)=0^2 + (2*0) + b right? how do you get b=0?
so, i need to find where f'(x)=0 for each condition? find all crotocal numbers for each interval?
**critical**
\[\lim_{x\to0^-}f(x)=b\]\[\lim_{x\to0^+}f(x)=c\]\[f(0)=0\]By definition thefunction will only be continuous at zero if\[\lim_{x\to0}f(x)=f(0)\]hence this is only continuous when\[\lim_{x\to0^-}f(x)=b=\lim_{x\to0^+}f(x)=c=f(0)=0\]
ok. that makes sense!
awesome, happy to help all credit to Zarkon though; this would've taken me ages to figure out alone!
limx→0 f(x)=a
is a the same?
are we talking about the same problem? if so, then no...
hmm. yea, i was talking about the same one. how do you find the lim of a?
you need to look at f(-2) and \(\lim_{x\to -2^{-}}f(x)\)
lim f(x) = lim(mx+a) = m⋅0+a=a x→0+ x→0+
right? except with a negative. not a positive in the x-->0-
no, f is not defined that way for x around 0
we are not on the same page here...look at what i typed. above
right, what is f defined as in the interval we are talking about?
lim f(x) = lim f(mx+a) = m(-2) + a x→−2(-) x→−2(-)
f(x)=mx+a in the interval, yes?
from the left, yeah
but the limit is -2, not 0. i got confused about the 0 because we just finished learning about critical #s and I keeo trying t set everything = 0
**keep
you always gotta look at the value that x is said to be approaching in the limit it could be anythin; x can go to infinity, zero, whatever
so, we have f(x)=-2m + a and lim x->0 for f(x) is -2
we find m using the definition of a derivative
like you did with M
but how do you get a?
you will need to find m first
derivative trick again
I though he had found m
he found M not m
oh right...
poor choice of variables :)
so yeah, derivative trick again f'(-2) from the right must equal f'(-2) on the left
how do you mean?
same thing we did to find M (another reason it confused me)
read above Zarkon's method if you didn't catch it
yea, i'm just wndering if it'd be [f(m+h) - f(m)] / h
it's always[f(x+h) - f(x)] / h
do you sub the whole mx+a in for x here?
f(x+h)=m(x+h)+a gotta remember these kinds of things ;)
understanding them the first time around would've helped too, i guess...
yeah, lol sometimes they don't teach first principles well :( anyway think you can get M ?
so, you don't sub the function into the formula, you sub the formula into the function?
(m(x+h)+a - mx+a) / h ?
(m(x+h)+a - (mx+a) / h
(mx+mh+a-mx-a) / h =mh / h
would it be -2=mh / h?
we are talking about M, yes?
m=-2
little m
in the first condition
oh right, so what about big M ?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!