first series is Summation from n=1 to inf 1/n and another series Summation from n=1to inf 1/n^2, why the first diverges and the second converges whereas both goes to zero
not the both should converge?
going to zero is "necessary but not sufficient"
you can find an easy proof that \[\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{k}\] can be made arbitrarily large by choosing large enough n
i can give you the idea of the proof, but it is cumbersome to write it all here, easier simply to google it
idea is take \[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{4}\] and say that it is less than \[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=1\] and keep going in this fashion, you can always add 1/2
what should I google ? I mean if i just type the series as I did here then it doesn't lead me to any good website
sorry, "greater than" not :less than
ok
it is called the "harmonic series" and it is a well known divergent series
so going to zero is certainly not enough, and this is the canonical example of a sequence that goes to zero, where the series does not converge
whereas \[\sum\frac{1}{k^p}\] does converge if \[p>1\] but that is p must be strictly greater than 1
integral test will prove this quickest
understood
what would I do without you hehehehe thanks bro
are you mathematician?
I mean you could be an engineer too?
yw i am just satellite
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!