Come up with the specific values of coordinates (x,y) of the highest point on the curve parameterized by [x(t), y(t)] = [te^t, 1-t^2] from t being negative infinty to infinity
so we should be able to find out whne the slope of the line tangent to the curve is zero
we can either take the derivative as is; or convert this to an x(y) deal and find when the slope is undefined
so dy/dx?
yes, but lets name is dx/dt and dy/dt just to be proper :)
\[-2t \div t ^{2}e ^{t}\]
and set that to 0?
the set to zero part is good, but lets see fif we can work on that derivatives better
r = < te^t, 1-t^2> the derivative of a componentwise function is the derivative of the components ....
r' = <t' e^t+t e'^t , (1-t^2)'> r' = <e^t+t e^t , -2t> r' = <e^t(1+t) , -2t> when r' = <0,0> we should be good
our critical point to chk, is (-1,0) do you see why?
because at point -1 thats the max x value? because e^0 = 1
:) remember that we found t values that should suffice; we need to plug these into our original set up to find the actual point that is defined
that might be in error, but it sounds good lol
lol im still a bit confused on what to do!!! so do i use dy/dx??
or just dy/dt and set that equal to 0?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y%3D+te%5Et+and+x%3D1-t%5E2 you set dx/dt = 0 and set dy/dt = zero this setup relies upon "t" for its values. x(t) and y(t) are function the depend on "t" to define them
the point -1,0 on the graph is the low point
ah and thats how u get -1,0? so what would be the high point?
its a critical point that we need to look at and determine its condition
the graph in the link shows that we are at a minimum and there there is no maximum other than infinity
ok and what do u mean by determine its condition, sorry this is taking me a while to understand
so no highg point exists?
when we place a condition upon something, then we want to know when it is doing what we want it to do. when the graph is doing a minimum then it is at a low point, a dip in the graph. when the graph is at a maximum, there will be a high point in the graph. the derivative simply tells us when the graph quits moving up and down; it doesnt tell us the condition of high and low.
so high point does not exist?
we need the second derivative if we are to NOT guess at this :)
ok so then u set that equal to 0? i got -2,0
xe^x + 2e^x
r' = <e^t(1+t) , -2t> derive it again for "concavity" r'' = <e^t(1+t)+e^t , -2> r'' = <e^t(2+t) , -2> ; this is never at (0,0)
2,-2?
err -2,-2 sorry i meant
asdf;laskjfaf lol so lost
when t=-2, there might be concavity; its hard for me to say cause I cant be to certain :) but, the value for r' seem to be values of t for each component
when t=-1, x is at a critical point; when t=0 then y is at a critical point
when t=-2, then x should be at a turning point in concavity
hmm
so would be the highest point, like the actual answer?
amistre are you sure we want r'=<0,0> ? my understanding is a bit different....
i was until i started trying to fit it to the graph :) but now i have to wonder ....
I think we need\[\frac{dy}{dx}={{dy\over dt}\over{dx\over dt}}=0\]
so that's\[\frac{-2t}{e^t(1+t)}=0\implies t=0\]as our only critical point
ah so would it be 0,1 then if u plug the value of t back into its original functions?
if got my x andy backwards in me graph :)
and that would be my high point? 0,1?
yes, I believe the point in question is <0,1> whether we can show it is a max and not a min I'm not sure about
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x%3D+te%5Et+and+y%3D1-t%5E2%2C+t+from+-2+to+2 i had this thing laying on its side lol
well yeah u can u choose a point before and a point after and see that it is less then 0,1
yeah, but I wanted to do it with concavity oh well, it is clearly the max, so there ya go :D
yeah, second derivative is\[\frac{-2}{e^t(1+t)}<0\]so there we can show it with concavity
thank u guys!
good job :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!