I was able to prove the direction "If A is invertible, then {Av1, ... , Avn} is a basis for R^n". But I am having a lot of trouble proving the other direction (If {Av1, ..., Avn} is a basis, then A is invertible. I was thinking the easiest way to do it would be to show that rank A = n, and then A would be invertible. However, I am having trouble showing that rank A = n...
if A is invertible then its row equivalent to the identity matix
if we know that the set is a basis for A, then we know it is linearly independant, and therefore has a nonzero determinant
and since Avn has n columns; and exists in R^n it has n rows making an nxn square
Oh really if vectors are linearly independent, then det A is not zero? I'm not sure if we learnt that o.O
if yor on basis, then yes, youve learnt that lol
det=0=dep; det not0 = not dep
Hm ok looking more through my book, there's only an end-of-chapter problem saying if they;re lin. independent, then det = not zero. But we didn't see it formally beforehand. I'm not sure if I can use it as a theorem
then use it the long way :) Since ..Avn is a basis then it only has the trivial solution Ax = 0
or rather; Avn is invertible if it only has the trivial solution for Ax = 0
something along those lines ... all those thrms and such mean th esame thing in the end
Oh I see. Ok i think that will work better
i hope so, cause thats all i can really remember of that stuff at the moment lol
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!