Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

need help with this integral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits_{0}^{1}lnxdx \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

pretty sure i need to us l'hopitals rule?just not sure

OpenStudy (zarkon):

parts

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep. btw, I think l'hopitals rule is for limits isn't it?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

I'm with those above me. Parts is the way to go.

OpenStudy (zarkon):

there will be a limit here...it is an improper integral

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I thought there was a limit?Ugh im getting lost

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so how would i use the limit in this?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

For parts, let \(u=\ln(x)\) and \(dv=dx\)

OpenStudy (zarkon):

\[\int\limits_{0}^{1}\ln(x)dx=\lim_{t\to 0^{+}}\int\limits_{t}^{1}\ln(x)dx\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, notice your lower limit is zero. lnx is not defined there so you'll have to let your lower limit = a and let a approach 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So I can not just put 0 in at some point?Im not sure why i would use parts here..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if i were you i would memorize this one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

math teachers love putting it on test and it would save you a lot of time to just remember that \[\int\ln(x)dx=x\ln(x)-x\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

check is easy, take the derivative and see that it works

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay so if i get xln(x)-x do I just evaluate from 0 to 1? Sorry never done one like this yet... So wouldnt you get 0-1?=-1?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Does that make sense?or did i skip a step

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well you do get -1 but not so fast

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because \[\ln(0)\] is undefined so you have to take \[\lim_{t\to 0^+}t\ln(t)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for this you can use l'hopital as the original post suggests

OpenStudy (anonymous):

form is \[0\times -\infty\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im just getting thrown off because of the 1 also...I understand we need to use the limit because of the 0 but just not sure about how to us the 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the 1 is straight forward \[1\times \ln(1)-1=1\times 0-1=-1\] the second part is the one that requires work, taking the limit

OpenStudy (anonymous):

standard trick for \[\lim_{t\to 0^+}t\ln(t)\] is to rewrite as \[\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{\ln(t)}{\frac{1}{t}}\] and use l\hopital

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im looking up l'hopitals rule again right now to make sure i remember it right...but i think id get it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so i take the derivatve of ln(t) and the one of 1/t? and that is l'hopitals rule right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

take the derivative separately top and bottom, simplify using algebra and replace t by 0, you will get limit is 0 in one step

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh that works. Thanks a lot!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yw

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!