Derivative help please!!! http://www.wiley.com/college/sc/hugheshallett/chap3.pdf Page 131 number 52 and 54
how bad can it possibly be?
just not sure what to do?
\[ g(a) = ae^{-2a}\] this one?
\[g(a) = e^{ae^{-2a}}\]
e^ae^-2a e^ae dx ae^-2a e^ae dx ae^-2a dx -2a
its a few chain rules
no on the pdf I posted page 131 numbers 52 and 53 about the graph
yeah, thats the one i posted, after trying to find the needle in a haystack ....
53-56 is about the graph
i would create a few linear equations to help out with 53-56
yeah just too clarify
lol, that ones alot easier to find stuf on :)
should have done that to start with lol.... I need most help on 54, 56,and 58
and since the graph is lines to begin with , the derivatives just define the slopes of the lines
h(1) = f(g(1)) whats g(1) = ?
54 you say .... that one was 53
not sure.. I think I have confused myself yeah just 54, 56, and 58
u = g(f) u' = g'(f) * f' its just a chain rule
so; u'(1) = g'(f(1)) * f'(1)
then the same concept for u'2 and u'3
ok cool thanks... I guess I was on track just late i guess lol what about the 56, 58
56 is same idea as 54 define your chain rule and plug in slopes and values etc ....
will you finish going through u'(1) with the numbers so I can see it all the way through
ill guide you, but youve got to find the numbers :)
deal
for example; f'(1) means the slope of f at x=1 so it might be a good idea to define the slopes of the 3 parts of the graph for good measure
whats the slope of f on the left?, of f on the right? and of g?
slope of f on left is 1/2 and right f is -1/2? slope of g is -1?
yep
or is it 2 and -2 ..thats seems better
4 up and 2 over is 4/2 = 2
u r right did it the wrong way :)
so: g' = -1 no matter what x is f' = 2 when x<2 f' = -2 when x > 2 agreed?
correct
u = g(f) u' = g'(f) * f' ; when x=1,2,3 we just plug it in u'1 = g'(f1) * f'1 = -1 * 2 = -2 do x=2 and x=3 for me based on this
so u=g(f) u'= g'(f) * f' u'= -1 * 4 = -4
when is the slope of f' = 4?
2
at x=2 ? is that your guess :) i already know why if so but its incorrect
Yes it is but I am so confused...
did we define the slope for f' at x=2?
x<2; f'=2 x>2; f'= -2 BUT, at x=2, we have no way to define the slope of a pointy place.
there is no slope there so no derivative?
correct :) no definable way to determine a derivate at a cusp, corner, pointy place
so u'2 cannot be defined either
ok let me try 3
g'(f(3))*f'(3) g'(2)(-2) (-1)(-2) 2????
exactly :)
GREAT!!! Thank you!!!
so i think I can do 56 what about 58
58 is the same thing; define your slopes from the given graphs to aid you in finding a solution to what they are looking for
D(f(g)) = f'(g) * g' define your slopes for given xs and use that to determine the answer
ok I think I can do that from the example above... it clicked in that last example... thx again for you help
your welcome :) and good luck
thx
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!