Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 17 Online
OpenStudy (aravindg):

REVISION QNS

OpenStudy (aravindg):

1. A loaf of bread gives 5kcal of heat to a boy .What is height he can scale by using this energy ,if his efficiency is 28 percentage and mass is 60?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

2.If 22 gm of CO2 at 27 is mixed with 16 gm of O2 at 37 degree .The temperature of the mixture is?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What is the units of the boys mass? What is the units of the temperature in problem 2?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

1.kg 2.degree

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Degree is not a unit. Rankin, Celsius, Fahrenheit, Kelvin are.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

celsius

OpenStudy (anonymous):

For Problem 1. First, convert kcal to Joules. This conversion factor is given as\[\rm 1 kcal = 4184 J\] Second, find the amount of energy from the bread the boy can use to climb. This is given as\[\eta = {out \over i n}\] where \(\eta\) is the efficiency, out is the energy the boy can use, and in the energy in the bread. Finally, from conservation of energy, we can find the height the boy can climb, assuming there is no change in kinetic energy as\[out = mgh\]where out is the energy we solved for in the second part.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

why is it mgh?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Because that is the equation for potential energy, which increases as the boy climbs.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

isnt it in*efficiency = mgh?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That would be what we get if the combine the two equations.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

ya i gt it!!

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k next one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We need to make a couple of assumptions. 1) Adiabatic mixing 2) Closed system 3) Constant specific heats (Does not change with temperature) 4) Ideal gas Realize that\[U_{CO_2} + U_{O_2} = U_{mix}\]where U is the internal energy.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since CO2 and O2 are ideal gases, we can write\[U = c_v(T_f - T_i)\] where \(c_v\) is the constant-volume specific heat.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That should be \[U = m c_v T\]Therefore, we can rewrite the equation as\[\left (m c_v (T_i) \right)_{CO_2} + \left (m c_v ( T_i) \right)_{O_2} = \left (m c_v (T_f) \right)_{mix}\]

OpenStudy (aravindg):

srry i did not get the last step

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I wrote the equation for internal energy wrong, it should be\[U = m c_v T\] We are drawing our system boundary such that is encompasses both gasses before they are mixed. After they are mixed, they will occupy the same total volume within the same system boundary. This come from the closed system assumption.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Therefore, before mixing the internal energy of the system is expressed as\[U_i = U_{CO_2,i} + U_{O_2,i}\]

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k i got that then hw u equated them?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We can write the internal energy of the mixture as\[(mc_v T_f)_{CO_2} + (m c_v T_f)_{O_2}\] Since, \(U_i = U_{mix}\) \[(mc_v T_i)_{CO_2} + (mc_v T_i)_{O_2} = (mc_v T_f)_{CO_2} + (mc_v T_f)_{O_2}\]

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k kk cntinu

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You can solve that equation for \(T_f\). That's it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Realizing that \(T_i\) is not the same for each species, but \(T_f\) is the same since the gasses are mixed.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k i hava similiar qn tell me if i jst need to apply the above formula for this one too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[(mc_v T_i)_{CO_2} + (mc_v T_i)_{O_2} = T_f \left((mc_v )_{CO_2} + (mc_v )_{O_2} \right)\]

OpenStudy (aravindg):

3.540 gm of ice at 0 celsius is mixed with 540 gm of water at 80 celsius .The final temperature of mixture in celsius will be

OpenStudy (aravindg):

shall i use here the same formula above?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, but you need to account for the heat of fusion of the ice.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

means ?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

an extra term will come?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you have access to thermodynamic property tables?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

no

OpenStudy (aravindg):

actually wat u meant by that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

They are tables that list thermodynamics properties (enthalpy, internal energy, entropy, specific volume, etc). Without them, we will have to use the following expression. \[\left(m \cdot(c_p T_i - h_f)\right)_{ice} + \left(m \cdot c_p T_i \right)_{water} = \left( (m_{ice} + m_{water}) c_p T_f \right)\]

OpenStudy (aravindg):

hmm .lemme work out that i will ask if i get a doubt k meanwhile i hav a qn: is specific heat of a gas in an isothermal process 0?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Absolutely not. Specific heat value doesn't depend on the process by which the fluid is undergoing. Specific heat only depends on the temperature for ideal gasses and temperature and pressure for other fluids. Isothermal means constant temperature. Iso - same, thermal - temperature.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

4.Two rods of same length and material transfer a given amount of heat in 12 s,when they are joined end to end .But when they are joined lengthwise they will transfer same heat in same conditions in how much time?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

12 s. End-to-end to me means the same as lengthwise. |dw:1333521257567:dw|

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k then?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you agree that end-to-end and lengthwise represent the same arrangement?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

i think lengthwise is parralel

OpenStudy (aravindg):

i maybe wrong

OpenStudy (aravindg):

wel the options are a)24 b)3 c)48 d)80 all in celsius

OpenStudy (anonymous):

They should be in seconds. We need to know the areas. From Fourier's Law\[{\Delta Q \over \Delta t} = -k A {\Delta T \over \Delta x}\]Assuming Q, k, and the temperature distributions are the same, we need to know how the area changes to find t.

OpenStudy (aravindg):

srry :P

OpenStudy (aravindg):

k...so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If the area increases, what must \(\Delta t\) do such that the equation is still valid?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

decrease

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How many answers are less than 12?

OpenStudy (aravindg):

wow fantastic thx:P

OpenStudy (aravindg):

b\y the by how we concluded that area incrases?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If they are in-fact round rods, the area of contact (mathematically speaking) will be zero. I'm just assuming that the rods do have a contact area, and that the radius is must smaller than the length.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!