Anybody good with calculus product rule? (x-2)e^(2-x)
\[(x-2)(e ^{2-x})(-1)+e ^{2-x}(1)=(e ^{2-x})(2-x)\]
Assuming that you want the first derivative.
Where does the (-1) come from??
comes from chain rule.
what is the derivative of\[2-x\]?
But I thought e differentiates to itself?
but you need to use the chain rule as .Sam. said....
\[{d\over dx}e^{2-x}=e^{2-x}\cdot{d\over dx}(2-x)=-e^{2-x}\]
@shallster are you familiar with the chain rule? or is the post above confusing you?
pretty confusing.
ok, can you take the derivative of\[(2-x)^2\]?
it's not asking me to do that though?? The equation is (x-2)e^(2-x) I need the derivatives of x-2 & e^(2-x) don't I??
yes, but you seem to have trouble differentiating\[e^{2-x}\]so I'm trying to help you do so
but i thought e differentiates to itself?
again: you \(must\) use the chain rule here \[\frac d{dx}e^x=e^x\]yes, but this is not the case here, we have a compound function so we must use the chain rule
You obviously know what you're talking about, so I'm all ears. I NEED help.
so again I ask you to demonstrate your understanding of the chain rule what if I asked you to differentiate\[(1-x^2)^2\]by using the chain rule, could you do that?
4x(1-x^2) ???
exactly, you had to differentiate the inside function as well now that I know you understand this I can explain the other derivative...
\[\frac d{dx}e^{f(x)}=e^{f(x)}\cdot f'(x)\]see? you still leave the e^(whatever) part the same, but you still must differentiate the second function, as always in the chain rule
do you agree with the above line? let me know what is confusing you if not
so e^(2-x) = -1e^(2-x)
yep :) now does mertsj's answer make sense?
I've got it down to e^2-x) - (x-2)e^(2-x) and I'm not that sure how to simplify it.
dang lag... factor out \(e^{2-x}\) like so\[(x-2)e^{2-x}\]\[e^{2-x} -(x-2)e^{2-x}=e^{2-x}(1-x+2)=e^{2-x}(3-x)\]so I think mertsj was a little bit off
I also struggle with factoring. I'm such a douche.
no, this kind of factoring is a bit tricky I learned it through problems like these as you can see, mertsj made a small mistake in factoring as well, despite his illustrious abilities it happens to the best of us ;) PS: as a mod, I have to ask you not to say the "d" word above I'd like to keep you around after all!
Understood.
I can't believe I did that. But, shallster, as you will learn, Turing is the resident expert. So always pay attention to him.
That I will.
thanks y'all ! you guys make the site what it is though agape love =)
Right back to you, Turing.
Still not sure how the -2 became +2 when factoring?
By distributing the -1
\[e ^{2-x}-(x-2)e ^{2-x}=e ^{2-x}[1-(x-2)]=e ^{2-x}[1-x+2]=e ^{2-x}[3-x]\]
I understand the rest but how does (1-(x-2)) expand to (1-x+2)?
distribute -1
I bet it's something really simple that my brain is bypassing!!
like that^ ? :)
\[-(x-2)=-x+2\]no?
ah, i see. Thanks guys.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!