Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Please help me with this problem! What is the velocity-time graph if the values for the position-time graph are: position(cm): 0, 6, 14, 25, 40, 60 and the time(s): 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Think you can help me out AccessDenied?

OpenStudy (accessdenied):

Um, I have an idea of how to do it... Velocity is just the rate of change of position with respect to time...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yup

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The values I got were: Velocity (cm/s): 0, 20, 26.67, 36.67, 50, 66.67 and the time is the same...Im not sure if this is right because when I graphed it, the first interval had the greatest slope

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How about you, what did you get?

OpenStudy (accessdenied):

I get the same values. I'll have to think about this more...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I was confused to why the slope was so great, and then I moved onto the acceleration-time graph and got: Accelaration(cm/s^2): 66.67, 22.23, 33.33, 44.43, 55.57 and the time is the same... Again, the slope of the first interval is so big

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Got anything?

OpenStudy (accessdenied):

Nope, I'm unsure... I don't know exactly how to get the exact velocity at a point given only points for position. We can only get the average velocity over intervals...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I thought you do y2-y1/x2-x1?

OpenStudy (accessdenied):

I'll try to find a helpful source on this... I can only think of finding the velocity given a position function. I'm not 100% sure given only points. D:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

What is the velocity-time graph if the values for the position-time graph are: position(cm): 0, 6, 14, 25, 40, 60 time: 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5? you have enough points given to define a function with

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im sorry, but I dont know how to get an equation from a set of data

OpenStudy (amistre64):

time is moveing in increments of 1; just notated a bit differently but still the same unit interval each time

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, but when I got the values for my velocity-time graph, the first interval had a greater slope than any other interval on the graph

OpenStudy (amistre64):

0, 6, 14, 25, 40, 60 +6 +8 +11+15 +20 .... +2 +3 +4 +5 +1 +1 +1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I dont understand, what are those numbers?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You are taking the difference between the numbers?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

those are the common differences between rows 1+2n +6n(n-1) might be a good explicit rule for the sequence

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok, but can you explain how to make a velocity-time graph from a position-time graph? Isn't it y2-y1/x2-x1?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i looks like im remembering parts of it lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, the slope at each point; but each point on a discrete lattice has no defined slope since it is essentially a corner

OpenStudy (amistre64):

it might be the average of the slopes that are on either side of it tho

OpenStudy (anonymous):

My pt graph has a curve as does my vt graph and my at graph, I thought that the vt graph was a derivative of the pt and the at graph was the second derivative of the pt

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And therefore go down in order

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I dont know why they are all the same

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Any ideas?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im thinking since velocity = distance/time that we simply do this: p = 0, 6, 14, 25, 40, 60 d = 0 6 8 11 15 20 t = .3 .........................

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well basically, what im doing is, I had to construct a ramp and drop a ball measuring 5 points on the ramp. I did that and with that data I constructed that position-time graph, the question project asks me to make a velocity-time graph and acceleration-time graph from the position time graph...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

do you have an angle for your ramp?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

|dw:1333946023580:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, with the information from the graphs, Im supposed to find the slope of the ramp

OpenStudy (amistre64):

.... nothing like working backwards lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol yeah

OpenStudy (amistre64):

acceleration is going to be constant simply because it mimics gravity; just at an angle

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that means velocity is going to be a linear line?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[a(t) = c_a\] \[\int a(t) = v(t) = c_at+c_v\] \[\int v(t) = p(t) = c_at^2+c_vt+c_p\] pick any velocity point as an inital value to solve for v(t) id spose

OpenStudy (amistre64):

is position with regards to height? or with distance traveled down the ramp?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That looks confusing...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

distance traveled down the ramp

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So, is my position-time graph right atleast?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Its a curve starting from 0 to 1.5, 60

OpenStudy (amistre64):

position(cm): 0, 6, 14, 25, 40, 60 time: 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5? rref{{.3^2,.3,1,6},{.6^2,.6,1,14},{1.5^2,1.5,1,60}} well, the data isnt quadratic as id expect it to be

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im sorry, I dont understand what you just did :P

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i row reduced 3 points of data to find the coeffs of a similat quadratic equation that should have matched it

OpenStudy (amistre64):

f(x) = 550/27 x^2 + 25/3 x +5/3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So, thats the equation for the pt graph?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

its an "almost" match for the given points

OpenStudy (anonymous):

WOW! it works

OpenStudy (amistre64):

well; at 0 we aint at 0 so its not an exact fit

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hmm, yeah you're right, but that IS the equation for the graph though right?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

it an equation for a graph that is close to it in the given interval

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So, there is no way to make a vt graph or at graph with the given data?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

prolly is, but without knowing what material youve covered as a guide, im just taking a blind stab at this. im thinking of trying eulers method on it tho; not that itll get me anywhere

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you think that we could make the vt or at graoh if I changed the data?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, the ball takes approximately 1.5s to make it to the bottom from the top, I could prolly extend that a little bit...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can I email you a picture of the ramp and the project sheet?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

(n^3+29n-30)/6 this is the equation that matches all of your points

OpenStudy (anonymous):

even zero?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

thats starting at n=1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

and its assuming intervals of 1 and not 3/10

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How did you even derive that equation?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i did what i tried to at the start, but let wolfram iron out the details

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How do I do that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops nvm :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok, so far, I have the values for a position-time graph, the values and I need to figure out how to make an at graph and a vt graph

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Maybe this will help you out, look at the first point,

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!