derivative of an integral!!! function is ln(1+t^2) and the Intergal from x=1 to x
This thing here makes no sense. I suppose you're trying to evaluate\[\int_{1}^{x}\ln(1+t^2)\text{ dt?}\]
\[ y=\int\limits_{1}^{x}\ln(1+t ^{2}) dt\]
question says find dy/dx of that integral
FTC
whats FTC?
the fundamental theorem of calculus
oh. i've never heard of it :/
That's like doing algebra and not knowing what multiplication is. ;P Give it a look.
your asking a calculus question and have never heard of the fundamental thrm of calculus?
basically, if\[F(x)=\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt\]then\[F'(x)=f(x)\]
oh ok yeah the derivative of an antiderivative is = f(x)
i think turings notation is a little off
the derivative is the inverse of the antiderivative (integral) a rather fundamental idea, hence the name what did I do amistre?
it's right. his explanation is the second fundamental! I remember now
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calculus boom, wiki-proof :)
\[F(t)=\int f(t)dt\] \[\int_{a}^{b} f(t)dt=F(b)-F(a)\] \[\frac{d}{dx}F(b)-F(a)\to\ F(b)b'-F(a)a'\]
it's not a to b though. it's a to x
sigh ... a and b are generic place holders
but there's a theorem for a to x
that's what I know as the second part.. sort of don't recognize the a' and b' part though I guess I always assume a and b are constant
...but mine is right too!
Amistre just generalized it.
we learnt about two fundamentals 1) is the one u stated and 2) is the one turing stated
:)
yeah, that is more general... you win this round amistre XD
but i see an error in mine; I F-ed on the derivaive instead of f-ing it lol
That sounds so wrong.
im getting cramps im laughing so hard from that one
:/
still stuck ?
the point being; we know f, a and b so it boils down to plugging it in f(b)b' - f(a)a'
ok.
f(x)x' - f(1)1' = f(x) = ln(1+x^2)
my prof said the answer was ln(1+x^2)2x-ln(1+x^4)4x^3
ok. i solved it. never mind. Thank you for your help
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!