Ask your own question, for FREE!
MIT 18.01 Single Variable Calculus (OCW) 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

solve 2x + lnx = 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hey yenny2012, I'm not sure if my solution is correct but I'll give it a try \[\log_{10} 10 = 1 \]so writing ln x as log x, we get \[\log_{10} x + \log_{10} (10)2x = \log_{10} (10)2\]bringing the RHS term over to left, \[\log_{10} x + \log_{10} (10)2x - \log_{10} (10)2=0\]Simplifying, we'll get \[\log_{10} x + \log_{10} 20x - \log_{10} 20=0\]Then using the formulas of Logarithm which is \[\log_{a} mn = \log_{a} m + \log_{a} n\] and \[\log_{a} (m/n) = \log_{a} m - \log_{a} n\]we'll get \[\log_{10} x(20x) - \log_{10} 20=0\]then \[\log_{10} [x(20x)/20] = 0 \]cancelling common terms of 20, we're left with \[\log_{10} [x ^{2} ] =0\]Taking ln both sides(rmb e^(log x) = x or e^(ln x) =x), \[e^{\log_{10} (x ^{2})} = e^0 \]which then gives us \[x ^{2} = 1\]and so \[x = \pm \sqrt{1}\]so \[x = \pm1\] please do point out if there's any mistakes! thanks :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\ln x = \log_{ e} x\] basically log with base of e so you cannot say " ln x as log x "

OpenStudy (mani_jha):

Simply differentiate both sides with respect to x: 2+1/x=0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Mani_jha your solution is not right. consider 3x-3=0 if you differentiate both side you will get 3=0 which is definitely wrong.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But log10(10)2x does not equal log10(20x) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2x + lnx = 2 lnx + 2x -2 = 0 Let us consider the function f(x) = lnx + 2x -2 Well if you study this function you'd see one point where the graph intercepts with the x-axis when y = 0 x = 1 witch the geometrical interpretation of the solution we'r looking for here, HOWEVER I do not know any analytical process to solve this kind of equations, though there is this method called "Newton's method"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lnx= 2(1-x) e^2(1-x)= x Taking logs with base 10, 2(1-x)log e= log x Now, log e= 0.434. Substituting, we get, 2*0.434*(1-x)= log x 0.87-0.87x= log x Now, converting to exponential form, x= 10^(0.87-0.87x) But a^(m-n) = a^m/a^n Therefore, here, we get, x= (10^0.87)/ (10^0.87x) Cross multiply. x* (10^0.87x)= 10^0.87 Now, by simple intuition, one can infer that this equation will hold true only if x=1. For any other value of x, x* (10^0.87x) will not equal 10^0.87. Hence, x=1.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

http://www.wolframalpha.com/ You can also see there steps

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Beknazar23 I tried really hard to get \[\ln \left( x \right) = \log_{e} x\] but I could not

OpenStudy (anonymous):

salil.s95 I don't agree with the last part of your answer. I try it as soon as I get a TI to see if I can give you a counter example..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[2x+lnx=2 \] Remember\[\ln1 = 0\]\[e^{0}=1\]therefore x=1\[2\times1+0=2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I graphed it and I found a better solution for it. we know that the domain is x>0. case 1: if 0<X<1 then 0<2x<2 then we know that if 0<x<1 then ln(x)<0. so we can conclude that: 2x+ln(x) < 2. case 2: then we substituent 1 in the function and we get 2x+ln(x)= 2+0 =2 case 3: now we consider that x>1 then 2x>2 and ln(x)>0 so 2x +ln (x) > 2 So the only solution is x=1.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!