Why is a Möbius strip not a possible surface to integrate flux on?
Ooh I like this question.
Wait I don't know the solution off the top of my head
lol
I hope u remember the answer :)
If I were smart I would. :( @TuringTest @FoolForMath @amistre64 This is like review for me. Going back through my text.
you can't integrate on it beacuse its an infinite surface, the surface has not limits so you cant actually integrate it
Qualitative answer. :P I'm taking a look at the strip equation to see what happens when I do. Proof by assume contra.
lol
Oh, because a definite integration results in a \(\infty\cdot0\) operation, is is undefined. So yeah, there you go.
ok thnx guys. So who thinks the deserve the best answer medal///??????
You lolol
@Eureka70 's answer was cleverer.
Mine was more rigorous, lol
Your choice. :3
i saw bad reference's should get it, it actually had math in it
lol I hate this ok Eureka is lower than bad so he gets the medal
thx but i'm only lower because i've only been a member to this site for like an hour
Because it is not orientable.
The flux of a field F is defined as a surface integral of Curl(F) dot the united normal vector n to the surface. n is an outward unit normal vector to the surface. The Mobius strip does not have an inner side or an outer side. It is not orientable and that is why we cannot define the flux through it.
Wait, so trying to perform the operations to non-orientable surfaces was incorrect, or the undefined answer was a sign that the surfaces were nonorientabke?
The flux cannot be defined on it.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!