To anyone who is good with Accounting: In what ways is Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts similar to Accumulated Depreciation? In what ways is it different?
Allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimated figure that could involve the company looking at the previous year's books and estimating a percentage that they will take of all of the accounts receivable and this portion is assumed to be noncollectable, it mainly deals with conservatism as you are ensuring that your books do not overstate accounts receivable. Accumulated depreciation is quite different but both accounts are contra-asset accounts, as the name suggests, accumulated depreciation increases overtime and essentially represents the total depreciation on the asset. Also, when calculating the book/carrying value you take the assets purchase price and subtract it by the accumulated depreciation. I guess you could both accounts deal with conservatism in that depreciating an asset is the recognition of the decrease in value of the asset over time. Also another thing to remember with depreciation, it doesn't necessarily occur at a constant rate and it varies based on the product, or at least it should, for example tax software for 2011 will depreciate much faster than a car, but a lot of the time the asset's life span must be estimated and so that ties in with the allowance for doubtful accounts as well, also when estimating these figures the accountant must be conservative and accuracy is impossible to guarantee, the estimates are almost never right.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!