Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

If S and T are matrices, and tilde (~) denotes the transpose of the matrix. \[\widetilde{\textbf{S}\textbf{T}}=\tilde{\textbf{T}}\tilde{\textbf{S}} \] How can I prove this statement.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

similary \[\left({\textbf{S}\textbf{T}}\right)^{-1}={\textbf{T}}^{-1}{\textbf{S}^{-1}} \]

OpenStudy (experimentx):

T(ST)' = T T'S' = S' ST(ST)' = SS' = 1 (ST)(ST)' = 1

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

So \[\textbf S \textbf T \widetilde{\textbf S \textbf T}=1\]\[\textbf T \widetilde{\textbf S \textbf T}=\textbf S^{-1}\]\[\widetilde{\textbf S \textbf T}=\tilde{\textbf T} \tilde{\textbf S}\] that is the whole proof

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

excusing the typographical error

OpenStudy (experimentx):

hehe .. no probs man

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

How come we can assume the first line?

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

dosent it rely on the result?

OpenStudy (experimentx):

can't seem to remember. I think it got something to do with the property of multiplication of Matrix with it's transpose. TT' = must equal to something Since if we consider matrix to be system of n vectors with m components. It gives you dot product with itself.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

the inner product of a normalized vector with it self which must be unitary

OpenStudy (experimentx):

well this is the special case of unitary matrix. It must be for general too.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

hmm ok,

OpenStudy (experimentx):

(a)ij 1<=i<=m, 1<=j<=n represent matrix A (b)kj 1<=j<=n, 1<=k<=0 represent matrix B AxB = summation j (a)ij(b)kj Must be something like that ... and since transpose changes rows into colums, A' = (a)ji

OpenStudy (experimentx):

A = (a)ij, B = (b)jk, AB = summation j (a)ij(b)jk = (ab)ik (AB)T = (ab)ki = summation j (b)jk(a)ij = BTxAT excellent proof here https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ASUT_enNP447NP447&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=how+to+prove+AB+transpose+is+B+transpose+A+transpose

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

thank you experimentX

OpenStudy (experimentx):

summation j (b)jk(a)ij <--- it cannot be a matrix multiplication unless it is transpose (because rows are not equal to columns) You are welcome.

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

yeah because it works even if the matrices are not square .

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

That is a great article thank you again, the author even alludes to the outer product,

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!