Check my work for average speed using calculus. See last post| \/
Peicewise Intervals 0-2 2-4 4-8 8-12 equations 2 x -2x x ads up to 4 +6+48+40 = 98 98/12(the time)
nice
When I say adds up to, I mean I took the integral.
Right idea, but you didn't include the negative sign when you evaluated the 4-8 interval. It dramatically changes the result.
there is an easier way since this involves no curves, just straight lines however, the functions you integrated, you forgot about the y_intercepts of the lines -2x+12 and x-12
I took the absolute value integral of the equations. Was I not supposed to do that?
no lines beneath axis represent neg velocity
Oh, I'm sorry, it's look for speed, not velocity. You should be correct then.
(Velocity incorporates direction, so you have to subtract negative velocities from your average velocity over a time period. Speed is just rate of movement independent of direction, so it doesn't matter if velocity is positive or negative.)
So, I'm correct?
I believe so.
i get 26/12 = 13/6
Area under curve from 0 to 6 is 14 Area of triangle from 6 to 12 is 12 since we assume pos speed, add the areas and divide by 12
hmm...
plus 98/12 = 8.1 the velocity never was greater than 4 so how can avg be 8.1 ?
Could you explain in some more detail how you got 13/6?
\[avg = \frac{1}{12}[\int\limits_{0}^{2}2dx + \int\limits_{2}^{4}x dx+\int\limits_{4}^{6}(12-2x) dx+\int\limits_{6}^{8}(2x-12) dx+\int\limits_{8}^{12}(12-x) dx]\] |dw:1334873183316:dw|
Cow is right, I feel dumb for not actually doing the math myself. The problem is twofold - first, the equations you used to describe the graph aren't accurate (2 and x are right, but try evaluating -2x at 4 and see what happens), and you need to integrate the positive and negative sections of the graph separately because you need to take absolute values of the negative terms. I got this: From 0-2, y=2 From 2-4, y=x From 4-6 and 6-8, y=-2x+12 From 8-12, y=-4+x Now integrate these equations over these 5 intervals and add the absolute values together and see what you get.
or don't use calculus at all, break it down into triangles and rectangles simple areas integral is just the area under a curve right
D'oh! I realize why I got it wrong. I forgot to add 12 and - 4! Thanks guys!
This is a connected question. Based on this question, I'd say that this is false. I just want to make sure. It looks pretty easy.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!