Question

.

Answer 1

These questions are based on opinion. If you are seeking to gain insight about this topic to develop your own opinion, I suggest you browse for information regarding such events and then create your own opinion rather than seeing what other people think.

If these are homework questions, please review the OpenStudy Code of Conduct regarding such matters.

Answer 2

I think to form an opinion it is best to read about the events. If you research these questions, the answer is quite evident. Look at your textbook, google the answers if that doesn't work. If you need resources you can ask us.

Answer 3

If you share yours I'll share mine :)

Answer 4

If you researched, then you should have came to an opinion. Go google the questions, word for word and you'll get so many direct answers. I just did, and about 15 yahoo answers questions asked the same things you did.

Answer 5

Well, there is a tactical and psychological side, which is evident, when you look up the history of it, and the Japanese's type of action at the time.

Answer 6

You always do this.

Answer 7

I don't want to sound mean but if you literally Googled "Why did the US drop a second atomic bomb on Japan" and read 2 yahoo answers links, you would have an answer.

Answer 8

Yeah. Thanks. Anyways, @Argonx16 and me are following the rules of this website.
http://openstudy.com/code-of-conduct

Answer 9

Because what the Nazis did during WW2 were considered crimes against humanity, like the Holocaust. In WW1, their crimes were not as severe.

Answer 10

They did not impose the prosecution of war criminals per say, but they did impose severe war reparations on Germany, which was source of their bitterness. And using that logic, to avoid a world war three. They did not prosecute war criminals, so it could be argued that they did not set the example that would have prevented world war 2. I am not sure, but I am not sure that the tribunal that is capable of prosecuting war criminals was not even set up until after world war 2.

Answer 11

@xokatexo
Look, we're only trying to help by encouraging you to find your own opinions. They aren't yours if you simply ask somebody what their opinion is. You need to take the time to develop your own understanding of the events so you can form your own opinion. Ok? :) So we're not trying to be mean, but it is against the code of conduct for this website if we simply just answer homework questions. And since this is opinion based, it is more for your own insight, not ours :)

Answer 12

So we cannot answer questions, then what is this all about?

Answer 13

@Maxine4seen, the OP is clearly asking for answers to a question that readily is googleable ("why did we drop a second atomic bomb on japan" returns 2.2 million results), many of which are yahoo answers or other webpages devoted to this subject. I believe that someone who asks questions on OS should have put time into the question, not just come here for answers, as we have seen before. Asking for answers on OS is a blatant violation of the CoC and every school's honor policy. OS is source for help, we will gladly direct someone to places where they find resources (google) which they can answer their question with. The question that was asked was semi-opinion based, it is best for someone to evaluate all the information and then form their own opinion rather than us feeding it to them.

tl;dr
It is against both OpenStudy's Code of Conduct to feed people answers,
It is against all school's honor codes to feed people answers,
Opinions are best formed by reading about the topic, which is what we suggested
The original poster has done things like this before, just come here for answers
The History group of OS has historically been plagued with people just asking for answers, and not for help, and that's something that needs to be changed

Can we close the question?