nCr/nPr=r! give proof.
Shouldn't it be nPr/nCr = r! ?
yes anonymous is right
agree
nCr = (nPr)/r!
the question is nCr=nPr/r! give proof.
\[nCr=\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}\] nCr is the number of subsets of r elements taken from a set of n elements. r! is the number of permutations of a set of r elements. Thus, if we multiply nCr by r!, we get the number of r-permutations of a set of n elements. In notation: \[nPr=r!*nCr\] This probably doesn't count as a proof. This is just an explanation of why this is true.
i never know how much proof is considered proof ...
nPr = n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)...(n-r+1) can we use the given defintions or do we have to reinvent the wheel?
\[nPr=\frac{n!}{(n-r)!}\]\[nCr=\frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}\] \[nCr = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!r!}*\frac{\frac{1}{(n-r)!}}{\frac{1}{(n-r)!}}=\frac{\frac{n!}{(n-r)!}}{r!}=\frac{nPr}{r!}\]
There is a proof in a book here. It goes like this: "The r-permutations of a set can be obtained by forming nCr r-combinations of the set and, then, by ordering the elements of each r-combination, which can be done r! ways. Consequently: nPr = nCr*r!"
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!