Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

another integration dilema

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

i like integration dilemmas >:))

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

\[\int\limits_{?}^{?}(tanx)^4 * (secx)^2 x dx \] find the indefinite integral. Also how do you put in the integration symbol that doesn't include upper and lower bounds?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

like i said before erase the "?" lol

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

ok I didn't see that sorry

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

hmm first things first...did you know that \((\sec x)^2 = \sec ^2 x?\)

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

yes it is actually in my book that way I just find it easier to type in that way

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

i asked because if you let u = \(\tan x\) then du = \(\sec^2 x\) so it will be \(\int u^4 xdu\) however...you still have a lone x there in your equation and you cannot integrate u if there is still an x..are you following?

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

yes that makes sense

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

remember i said u = \(\tan x?\) how do you suppose we isolate x?

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

the arc tangent of x?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

integrate by parts maybe?

OpenStudy (turingtest):

then we get integral of tan^5x

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

i am a bit confused when you say du= ...... was under the impression that du=f'(_) dx. so you have to make the f prime funtion match what you already have

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the usub aint magic, it only helps to clarify; but if theres parts that dont u up, its useless

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

solution is\[(1/5) \tan^5x + c\]

OpenStudy (turingtest):

then you typed an extra x

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

yeah...i didnt see the x :/ i thought it was u-subbable but i think it's possible to integrate by parts after u-sub right...

OpenStudy (turingtest):

\[\int\tan^4x\sec^2xdx\]is not the same as what you had

OpenStudy (turingtest):

so simple u-sub\[u=\tan x\]try to proceed from there

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

I think you are right turing test looking at the original I typed in it should have been only "dx" not "xdx" sorry

OpenStudy (turingtest):

it's okay, at least it makes the problem a lot easier

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

for you lol

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

oh lol =)) then what i have been saying was right until the arctangent-ing of x haha =)))

OpenStudy (turingtest):

yup :)

OpenStudy (zarkon):

ah..xdx was a nicer problem :)

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

remember what i said earlier @chrisplusian that let u = \(\tan x\) so du = \(\sec^2 x dx\) substitute those into \(\int \tan ^4 x sec^2 x dx\) what will you have?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i agree :) xdx was nicer

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

I don't know why I don't see these problems easier. When you point out what the u is it is a

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

piece of cake

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

don't know why I don't see it myself

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

hahaha it just takes practice :DD

OpenStudy (turingtest):

learning your derivatives well will help you recognize what choices to make for u, so practice that

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

don't let my simpleton dx stop all you fans of xdx hahahah

OpenStudy (chrisplusian):

ok turing test thank you all for your continued support

OpenStudy (turingtest):

I think we could have done that by parts.... if it were xdx you are welcome :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!