The solution of a certain differential equation is of the form y(t) = a e^(2 t) + b e^(5 t), where a and b are constants. The solution has initial conditions y(0) = 3 and y'(0) = 5 . Find the solution by using the initial conditions to get linear equations for a and b. y(t)= ?
you never replied to my earlier efforts to help you... where are you stuck?
I thought I had it figured out but the answer didn't match
I don't know where I went wrong
\[y(t)=Ae^{2t}+Be^{5t}\]and we also need \(y'(t)\) what did you get for that?
\[y'(t)=2Ae^{2t}+5Be^{5t}\]so what system results from subbing in \(t=0\) ?
Yup that's what I used, e^0 = 1 so 2A + 5B
well first off what did you get for a and b ?
Just A + B right?
=what?
For y(t), then y'(t) = 2A +5B
not quite\[y(t)=Ae^{2t}+Be^{5t}\]it's important to make the distinction between that and the given value\[y(0)=A+B=3\]only by using the second part entirely can we solve the system
by "the second part" I mean both the x and y values of the initial conditions
so we also have that\[y'(0)=2A+5B=?\]
so y(0)=A+B=3 and y'(0)= 2A+5B=5
good, now you only have to solve the system
This is where I went wrong
what were your final answers?
A=1 B=4 ... I think I'm confusing this
no that's not right I think you may need a system solving review
let's use elimination: try subtracting \[y'(0)-2[y(0)]\]
what is the resulting equation?
a= 8/3 b= 3-(8/3) does this work?
no, I think you got B turned negative somehow and messed up A...
b=1/3
actually b=-1/3
I suppose that's where you went wrong
...are you not seeing it?
I'm using a=8/3 and b=-1/3 and its still not working
that's because \[A\neq\frac83\]
use the first equation and remember the signs that's what's getting you, those darn minus signs
\[y'(0)=2A+5B=5\]\[-2y(0)=-2A-2B=-6\]so\[y'(0)-2y(0)\implies3B=-1\implies B=-\frac13\]now use the formula for \(y(0)\) again...
\[y(0)=A+B=3\implies A=3-B\]
And isn't 3-(1/3) = 8/3
but\[B\neq\frac13\]watch your signs!!!
Ohhhh! My bad lol, so it's 10/3
yeah :) and if these things are allowed you could have just solved the system using wolfram http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sovle%20x%2By%3D3%2C2x%2B5y%3D5&t=crmtb01 that becomes reasonable with larger systems
That's where I went wrong :/ Thanks for your patience :-)
Ahh thanks for the link, it'll be useful!
...but you should know how to do a 2x2 system like this you're welcome, anytime :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!