Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Use the definition to determine whether {(-1)^n} is a Cauchy sequence ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know it is not a Cauchy sequence because it is not converges. But how we show it by definition of Cauchy theorem?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

anyone?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The idea of a Cauchy sequence is that the difference between numbers gets arbitrarily small far enough into the sequence. So formally, for some N we have for all n>N: \[|a_n-a_{n-1}|<\epsilon\] for any epsilon Does that happen here?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what thomas said. also it is important to know how to negate the definition. a sequence is NOT cauchy if...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if \[\left[a _{n}-a _{n-1} \right]>\epsilon\] for some n>N

OpenStudy (anonymous):

cauchy if for all \(\epsilon>o\) there is an N such that for all m, n> N \(|a_n-a_m|<\epsilon\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

to negate the definition, change "for all" to "there exists" and negate the conclusion sequence is not cauchy if there exists an \(\epsilon\) such that for all N if m, n > N we have \(|a_n-a_m|>\epsilon\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you get to pick the epsilon, and i think \(\frac{1}{2}\) would work nicely

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah..that's correct...i will try it with epsilon 1/2..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

to be more precise i should have written not cauchy if there exists an \(\epsilon\) such that for all N there exists n,m > N with \(|a_n-a_n|>\epsilon\)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!