The function f is continuous for -2≤0≤2 and f(-2)=f(2)=0. If there is no c, where -2≤c≤2, for which f ' (c) = 0, which of the following must be true? a for -2≤k≤2, f ' (k) > 0 b for -2≤k≤2, f ' (k) < 0 c for -2≤k≤2, f ' (k) exists d for -2≤k≤2, f ' (k) exists, but f ' is not continuous e For some k, where -2≤k≤2, f ' (k) does not exist
Rolle's Theorem states: Suppose that f is continuous on a closed interval, that the derivative f' exists at every point of the open interval, and that f(a)=f(b)=0. Then there exists at least one point c in the open interval such that f'(c)=0. Which part of the hypothesis could be false?
I don't think I ever learned Rolle's Theorem, but the answer is supposed to be E. I'm not sure how it is supposed to be though.
What about the Mean Value Theorem? Rolle's Theorem is just a special case of that. Look at what needs to happen to use the theorem: 1) f is continuous on a closed interval [a,b] 2) the derivative f' exists at every point in the open interval (a,b) 3) f(a)=f(b)=0. One of these must not be true if your function doesn't have a point c such that f'(c)=0.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!