Anybody good with sequences and series?
What is the sum? \[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^n (\frac{2}{3})^{n-2}\]
@lgbasallote help him!
Well, you know... please. :)
Really, I'm just wondering if there is a formula I can use. Can I use the typical geometric a/(1-r) for an alternating infinite series like this? Or is the formula a little different because it is alternating?
Can you break it up into negative and positive terms, use the geometric model for each one, and then add the results?
I bet that would work. I'll give it a shot.
Perhaps I could also multiply the (-1) with the (2/3) because the way the exponents effect the numbers, the series would be the same.
Yikes! Maybe not... :)
I'll try the positive sum + negative sum idea. Thanks!!
The negative terms would be: Starting term (-2/3) common ratio 4/9 Except all multiplied by (-3/2) The positive terms would be Starting term 1 common ration 4/9 Right?
The negative terms gave me -1.8 and the positive terms gave me 1.8 So I'm pretty sure this series telescopes to 0. The other thing is that there's probably some fancy way to rearrange the terms so that they cancel out.
I see the negative terms starting at -3/2 and the positive terms starting at 1 with a common ration of 2/3
See well... I don't think it makes sense to consider -3/2 to be the starting value. What is the second negative term of the sequence?
-2/3
The negative terms: (-3/2) (-2/3) (-8/27) (-32/243) Don't you agree?
I do.
Okay, actually it should work to consider (-3/2) the first term. What is the common ratio?
The common ratio is 2/3
(-2/3)*(2/3) = (-8/27)?
(-3/2)*(2/3) = (-2/3)? The math there isn't working out...
Oh - would the common ration need to change because we are removing the negative terms when we sum the positive values only?
ration = ratio
(2/3) was the common ratio for the original sequence, but for the negatives only, (2/3) is getting multiplies twice to get to the next negative, so the new common ratio is *(2/3)*(2/3) = *(4/9)
You're right! And I can see how that would work with the powers too... ok, I'm on board. :)
Cool. But I agree with you that (-3/2) is the starting value for the negative sequence. And that changes the answer that I get for the sum of that sequence.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28-3%2F2%29%2F%281-%284%2F9%29%29+%2B+1%2F%281-%284%2F9%29%29
Yep! That's it!!
Thank you so much!!
My pleasure =D
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!